I need a break from Catullus and his ego, so...I post.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gil
again as usual, apoligies if i have made a mistake
|
So...you've covered all your bases in one sentence?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Manwe
I would like to make a small point about Legate's annoyance over the banter. I find it rather odd. Why get annoyed? Banter may cause people to slip up, and the things they say may reveal their mood. Meh, this is a game...albeit involving death.
|
I agree, it is a game. So maybe fun bantering should be a part of it (and I think it is, whether it "should be" or not. But you question someone's denunciation of bantering, while you have not only denounced analysis but also pretty much deemed it "wolfish."
Thank you for the analyses,
Roa. I actually find your analysis of
Hookbill most interesting to me because I can't say I've considered him much, unfortunately. He played Day 1 undeniably safe, and asserted mostly typical humour and "banter," keeping his posting light. Without accusations - with evidence backing them or no - or even serious *investigation* of people, there's no lines crossed, no one's offended, no trails. And on Day 1, you can get by with that.
We'll have to see if he continues to try and do so toDay, I suppose.
I'll be back as soon as I can (if I have a brain left after more Latin and some calculus in the mix). The
Garin voters need serious looking at, as well as the no voters.
Oh...and anyone want to venture a post-by-post analysis of
Roa?
