Quote:
|
Originally Posted by the guy who be short
I have already made a similar suggestion. I advised a shortlist. However, we need more known innocents for a shortlist to be mathematically plausible and not manipulated by the Faithful.
|
I'm pretty uncomfortable with all this shortlist stuff in principle. But I will tell you what I think.
Quote:
- All those who voted for Roa.
- All those who considered believing Roa.
For opposing themselves, on a mathematical basis, to the needs of the village. It is clear now that Roa intended for us to waste a day. I made it clear that I did not believe her for a second, because her argument was illogical. Because it was illogical, this leads me to believe that those who did accept it were Faithful, trying to make an issue of it and help waste the day.
|
I do disagree with you on this somewhat. If we already have a terrifying number of those who can influence the vote why give them one more? And no one says we would have gotten a Faithful yesterDay anyhow, on the contrary the basic odds were against us. And it was not illogical, that was the beauty of
Roa's game yesterDay: it was a perfectly possible scenario.
But let's not make an issue out of this as I do believe this breaks the lines of us innocents already...