I’ve got some thoughts together. They are somewhat based on previous WW experience (and partly influenced by Nogrod’s quiz in his WW game) as well as the current game.
Brinniel - I’ve got very little experience of her. But the smooth dark-horse routine that others have commented on is a bit suspect. I don’t like the way that she seems to pick up the gauntlet
Saucie throws down in post 336, voting for
Rune almost as if she was dared to.
Durelin – she is someone who I traditionally tend to suspect. I’ve been trying to fight against this and view her in an unbiased way. But there’s willful confusion in her posts, and that “yay!” is a classic wolf-post intro. I’m not happy.
Gil-Galad – Being much the same as always. That daft remark about Glirdan leads me to think he is probably innocent.
the guy who be short – Again, someone whose style I tend to find suspicious. But what tends to happen when I play with tgwbs is that I start off finding him very odd and suspicious and then my suspicions wear off. I will wait and see if this happens in this game.
Hookbill the Goomba – I know the breezy air is making people feel edgy but there’s an air of sincerity about his posts, I think.
Kath – A scary, scary girl (quack!) but I seek consolation in this comment about Roa which feels somewhat innocent:
Quote:
think it would be worth killing her. Firstly we're rid of a most confusing influence, and second the thread will get a good bit shorter
|
Kitanna: I’m never sure what to make of her and like Kath she's someone who can act the same whether she's wolf or innocent. So far, in this game, she feels sort-of-ok.
Legate of Amon Lanc – Hmmm. The smoothly helpful newbie. Needs watching.
Mänwe – the stroppy noisiness on the first day was odd. Again, needs watching.
Mithalwen – is really puzzling me. Conversely to guy and durelin, she is someone I naturally incline to trust in ww. I know she can be jumpy, but there's something that just doesn't feel right. However, I’ll hold and wait on her for a while.
Rune Son of Bjarne – Another one I'm naturally suspicious of. But actually, I don't find him especially suspicious at the moment.
The Saucepan Man – I always fear Saucie as a matter of principle, so I’ve been looking at him closely. He is not the Cobbler in this game – thank goodness. But I’m a bit worried about this:
Quote:
So, I find myself rather wary of those who voted other than for Roa
|
Then, later, his top two suspects are people who did vote for Roa. At around the same time as him. Go figure.
Actually, I’m inclined to think a wolvish Saucie would be more cautious and consistent than this. But I’m going to continue scrutinising closely.
Thinlómien – I do incline to trust Lommy so I've been trying to treat her with sceptism to counter this. However, in this game I am finding her innocent. Her point about no trail for kills was a good one, as is this:
Quote:
think no one should start toDay what some started yesterday: trying to find clues from Roa's posts. It's just useless. She's cunning enough to make the posts misleading and as she had no real information, the analyser would be wasting his/her time
|
.
Furthermore, her analyses of people are roughly in accordance with mine, which I’ve always found a good indicator of innocence.
So –
Probably innocent – Lommy, Gil.
Possibly innocent – Kath, Kitanna, Hookbill, Rune
Watching: Brinniel, Legate, Manwe
Not happy about – Mith, twgbs, Saucie.
Most suspicious - Durelin