[the guy who be short]

+ Lalaith expressed faith in Rikae.

- Mithalwen expressed some doubt about Rikae possibly not being the seer, post 232.

- Kath, post 241, also starts expressing doubts about Rikae.

- Kitanna, post 245, doubts Rikae.

- Looking back, Manwe seemed most insistent about believing Roa. As well as his very suspicious first post on it, he posts again at 227 and post 235, each time dedicating his post to the possibility of Rikae lying and coping with it.



In conclusion about those doubting Rikae, I find Manwe most suspicious of all these. His first post made it seem like doubt of Rikae was widespread, and thenceforth he has been most vocal in doubting her. I feel he is probably faithful and may switch my vote to him.

Kath switching from believing Rikae in post 213 to doubting her in 241 troubles me - as if she switched, seeing that the idea were taking root, to further propagate it.

What to make of Rune, Brinniel, Kitanna and Mith I'm not sure.


I feel that this is very important. The thread yesterday seemed to be going forward fine, with analyses and suchlike, until people started believing Roa's story. That messed up the thread and wasted a Day where we could have killed a Faithful.


Mith - I appreciate the trust, but I must say you confuse me completely. I have gone from strongly suspecting you to strongly believing in your innocence and back again. You feel innocent to me - you act as though you have the village's interests at heart.

I don't agree with your retrospective "lynch-Glirdan" idea, because, while he may have been a wolf, it would have been even better to lynch another (non-Roa) person and so kill a(nother, if Glirdan had turned out to be Faithful) potential Faithful.


Mith also makes an excellent point about Lommy. How did she know Glirdan was innocent? I almost voted Manwe, but I may reserve my switch for Lommy unless she explains what she was thinking when she posted that.