So just a few short points and then it's unfortunately back to reading a bunch of essays... I'll be back for the last hours though and try to make the best out of them.
Then I'm just crossing my fingers that the Ranger got my hint yesterDay when I repeated my security of being alive toDay such many times so that s/he did not protect me last Night and I might still have one Day more in this game as on Tuesday I would actually have time to play more than toDay...
Spm: He behaved exactly as I thought. That unhappily doesn't prove anything. With him I was probably more after the reactions of the others. Unfortunately there were next to none of those. The whole row between
Spm and
Durelin about whether
Durelin defended
Spm or not looks interesting though. I will not erase
Spm from my list of suspicion but neither do I see myself voting for him or encouraging anyone to lynch him toDay.
tgwbs: I think was even more uptight than I thought he would be. He clearly tried to keep up a composed manner but somehow I got the feeling that he was overdoing it somewhat. Comments like:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tgwbs
I have the third highest post count among the living villagers, and have been offering analyses every day.
|
just sound pretty bad to my ears at least. Also I must say that his vote on
Gil-Galad looks to me the most unfortunate from the standpoint of the innocents. I do share his annoyance with the playing style of
Gil but I'm not sure if we are having the luxury of testing the silent ones out anymore if we don't get a few Faithfuls off first...
Durelin: Her reactions were a bit confusing. Her tenor of almost hurt feelings and her open distaste regarding the way I played looked somewhat sincere. But then again that is a good tactics as well. I kind of thought she was slipping once or twice in our little "conversation" earlier toDay but there are points to balance them as well. I would suspect her a bit less than
tgwbs at the moment. Which isn't a great relief to her but anyhow...
Others:
Gil jumped to my open suspicion very easily - like he did yesterDay too. With one appearance / Day where he just states that "as Nogrod suspects X, I'll vote him" I would be quite ready to vote him out just as a matter of principle. But I'm not sure that we can afford that as it will be somewhat totally random vote and there are still enough innocents to make the probabilities pretty bad for such a check. Here I disagree with
tgwbs again and think he's up to no good...
Lommy also took my rant with
Durelin in pretty too easily. She had analysed her earlier and come to a conclusion that she didn't actually have any points against her but still took my suspicions as they were and went with them. Lommy is a clever player and she might use things like this to her advantage. Although it must be said to her defence that she had to leave early and was forced to vote on that time and there was little time for her to make any major inquieries in the morning (RL).
EDIT: X'd from Kitanna...