View Single Post
Old 03-05-2007, 03:40 PM   #532
Lalaith
Blithe Spirit
 
Lalaith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,779
Lalaith is a guest at the Prancing Pony.Lalaith is a guest at the Prancing Pony.
Well, wipe my nose and call me Yusopov

I'm delighted that one of my trio of suspects has bit the dust, even though it was a shame that the lynch was conducted through somewhat unorthodox means.

I am still, after yesterday's messy events, unshaken in my beliefs. I find Rah-rah ras-Saucie incredibly wolflike and Durelin also - I refer for reasons to my post 473 of yesterday. Added to which - Saucie's bare-faced deviousness of yesterday and Durelin's non-reading-of posts admission.
I'm sorry, missy, but there's only two WW games where I haven't at some point when I've had the time, read all posts closely. Once was when I was a wolf, when I knew everyone's identity, and just skimmed looking for stuff to frame people with, and once when I was a lover, when it was a similar scenario, my wolf-lover Ang told me everyone's identity. In all other games - as in this one - I was a clueless innocent, reading everything because I don't know who the culprits are and I'm desperate to know, combing the thread for clues. You're a smart girl, and if you're not reading posts properly there can be only one reason.

The fourth wolf I am less sure of, but I think it can be found among (in order of suspicion) Mith, Kitanna and Kath.
Mith - I don't mind her voting for me all the time, but aside from saying, on day one, that I was acting funny, she's never given a reason except she's always suspected me. Which is kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Plus she and Saucie should by rights have had a row by now and they haven't.

Kitanna - hmm, mixed feelings. Her post 471 seems to be a helpful villager and her reason for voting for me was so wolf-like it was almost innocent, if you get my drift.

Kath - well there is dodgy stuff about her (again refer to 473) but in her favour I think it was she who first pointed out Durelin's not-reading-posts thing.

I still think Lommy and Gil are innocent. In fact, Lommy, if you are a Faithful, frankly you deserve to win as far as I'm concerned, rarely have I seen such a convincing display of innocence. I am reasonably confident about Legate, and I am ambivalent about Hookbill.

Unless something very dramatic happens, call me Yusopov. Much as I enjoyed the little ding-dong with Saucie yesterday, any innocent analysing it should see how darned devious he was being. I will fight to get him lynched today.
__________________
Out went the candle, and we were left darkling

Last edited by Lalaith; 03-05-2007 at 03:43 PM. Reason: got post numbers wrong
Lalaith is offline   Reply With Quote