Gil-Galad: Voted for TGWBS, apparently having been swayed by Nogrod’s case against him. Possibly a Faithful-on-Faithful vote but unlikely as there was a fair bit of focus on TGWBS at the time. Even more unlikely in light of TGWBS’ vote for him. Then again, Gil is a law unto himself when innocent and I reckon that he would be the same when guilty. Still no idea about him, but I am not currently inclined to vote for him.
Lommy: Voted for Durelin, having suspected her before and having felt that Nogrod brought up good points about her. As I said yesterDay, if Durelin is a Faithful then, in light of this vote, Lommy is most likely innocent. And since I believe Durelin to be a Faithful, I am feeling a lot more comfortable about Lommy.
Mithalwen: Voted for Lalaith on the basis of her ongoing suspicion. With a few exceptions, Mith has voted pretty consistently for Lalaith. It’s a characteristic Wolfish/Faithful voting pattern, although dangerous if the “suspect” is lynched and turns out innocent. For that reason, I somehow doubt that a Faithful Mith would have voted for an innocent Lalaith yesterDay, with suspicion gathering around Lal the way it was. And, although I still have serious reservations about Lalaith, I don't see it as a Faithful-on-Faithful vote either. Mith remains low in my suspicions.
Kitanna: Voted for Lalaith on the basis of her “gut feel“ and also, I think, because of Lalaith’s vote for Brinniel, having stated that she was not one of her top suspects. Depends whether Lalaith is a Faithful or not, really, as this does not look at all like a Faithful-on-Faithful vote to me. I have been unsure about Kitanna throughout, but I was somewhat comforted by her contributions yesterDay. The jury’s still out for me on Kitanna.
Kath: Voted for me on the basis that I claimed Durelin was defending me, when she thought that she was not, and so thought me to be twisting Durelin’s words. Actually, it was Nogrod who claimed that Durelin was defending me and, from what I saw, I agreed with him. So it looks to me like it was Kath who was misrepresenting the position. I had felt better about Kath yesterDay, but this vote tweaks my suspicion meter big time.
Hookbill: Voted for me, apparently on the basis of instinct, putting me on 2 votes to Lal’s 3. Claiming “instinct” seems to me to be a very convenient way of avoiding having to state any reasons (unless, of course, you are Valier and have a proven track record
). I know that I am innocent, so I find this vote to be distinctly suspicious. I was wary of Hookbill before and I am even more so now.
Lalaith: Voted for TGWBS, putting him on 3 votes, level with herself and one ahead of me, then retracted at the last moment to vote for me (which should have seen me done for). If she is a Faithful, this was a strange vote since I would have expected her to vote for me. That said, I do not discount the possibility that she thought TGWBS the more likely to be lynched, took the opportunity to gain some credit for helping to do so and then, when she saw the opportunity to save the both of them, took it. In any event, she knew that she had her retraction (although she left it fairly late). I still find her extremely suspicious, particularly for her behaviour yesterDay, but this vote has me wondering.
Durelin: Voted for Legate and then quickly retracted and voted for me. Have there ever been two more suspicious votes cast in such quick succession? This looks to me like she hastily decided to put in a safe vote, then promptly thought better and took the opportunity to try to get me lynched. To my mind, these votes pretty much confirm my suspicions of her.
Legate: Did not vote, which I don’t like at all, but he has explained it on the Admin thread.
Now back to look at the previous Day’s votes in light of TGWBS’s unmasking.