Unusually I seem to be at least half-awake at this hour and can't resist commenting on a few points.
It's funny that
Roa and an over-active
Gil (does this sudden activity tell us anything? he's a wolf = bad for us, or he's just actually starting to play the game = good for us) are having a row. That would suggest to me that at least another one of them is innocent. If they were both wolves they would not argue like that as it would be quite clear that
Roa could talk
Gil to the gallows in a wink of an eye if she so wanted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roa
Don't be so sure- it's happened before. Ask Lommy. She's in the Fenris Wolf club because of her fellow wolf Ang, who managed to survive till the very last day, mostly because everyone regarded him as innocent for voting her.
|
I agree with the "don't be so sure" -part here. Helping to lynch a mate is a good tactics for a werewolf in certain situations. I've done that myself as
Roa has been keen to remind you.
But I'm a bit puzzled why always so intelligent
Roa is so happy to jump on my vote and to try and make an issue out of it. It's the same kind of argument that some people here seem to throw on
Lommy. "It was the reasonable thing to do (her vote on
Glirdy and my vote on
Glirdy), but if s/he were a wolf, s/he would have done the same..." That's hardly an argument. If a vote is reasonable for an innocent and if a witty wolf would thence do the same thing, it can't be counted as an argument for someone's lupinity.
With that logic everyone who voted reasonably should be seen as especially suspicious.
And that's hardly the way
Roa herself thinks about the matters, right? I don't remember seeing
Roa who would have carried the card of random voting yet...
Now I need to get to sleep at last. Sad I didn't have time to see
Roa's analysis which I kind of hoped for. It seems she makes it with piety - at least with what comes to the time she has spent with it...