[Boromir88]

I've found something that was rather peculiar...yesterday Shastani said this in post 16:

"Calm, you two... this early on, I doubt there's much of anything in the way of evidence to go on. There's no real point in accusing each other when there's no proof of guilt or innocence whatsoever."

To which I responded in Post 39:

I think accusations reveal the character of a person, and I find accusations to be about as helpful as anything (besides blind luck) on Day 1. I find accusations to be a good thing, so I think it's awkward Shastani, you are telling us to not do it.

A bit later on Legate said to me in Post 43:

Well I think we'd agree that without accusations we'd get nowhere. However, the ones who care the most on getting someone under any suspicion are the Vampires. So I find Shastani's comment rather in place, or at least I see it "unharmful".

I had cross-posed with Gil today, but as we both picked up Shasta had left Legate out of the 'suspicious' list of yesterday. Which I find to be really odd looking at the considerate amount of suspicion Legate came under yesterday. Now Legate wasn't likely to be lynched, but I have no reason to doubt Mac saying he voted for Legate (seeing as he had consistantly expressed worries about Legate), plus several others commenting on being 'uneasy' about Legate. I mean from the tallies yesterday Legate did receive 3 votes.

There is a connection between these two that I find to be extremely vampiric looking. Legate slightly defends Shasta saying his comment was in line...and then today Shasta leaves Legate out of his list today. Perhaps attempting to get people to focus on Rikae, Gil, and SPM as suspects?

(Though I encourage anyone to stop me if they believe I'm making too much out of nothing). However, do we have a vampire connection between Legate and Shasta here?

Edit: x-ed with Rikae