Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Celuien
I'm really failing to see a train of thought/point in this. You say it was Eomer's thought you agreed with, but then you say he had no point and so naturally it was Celuien's thought you agreed with. Despite her posting it after what you said.
|
I said I agreed with what I
thought Eomer was saying; i.e, that your post (so easily forgotten now) looked somewhat suspicious.
He then claimed he had no point; but
Celuien had found the same things suspicious in your post that I had, and yes,
for the third time, I forgot whether
Cel or I said these things first. I had seen it as the point of
Eomer's accusation, though he now claims it wasn't, and assumed
Celuien did the same thing I did - that is, saw
Eomer's post, looked at your post, and saw how fishy it was.
I've already explained this
three times. You are blatently misrepresenting what I said now; the first post could be an honest mistake, but this makes me wonder if it was deliberate after all.