[Boromir88]

Ahh...Mac if you're a vampire we are in trouble, I like your point about Eomer. It's most probable that Eomer is an innocent, though we shouldn't take that as a known fact. Your reminder that Eomer is not 'known innocent,' is quite true...though I would tell you that for now I think Eomer is one of the most innocent looking members here and I find others to look more vampire-ish.

Is it just me or is there something mighty wrong about the way Nogrod and Espiem are argueing with each other? It doesn't leave me with the feeling of two innocents bashing it out.~Mac

No alarms are raised in me about SPM, he looks innocent to me. I'm a little less sure about Nogrod and haven't reached a decision on him yet.

Both Nogrod and Boromir88 are smart enough to have thought of using such subtle tactics, so I think at least one of them is likely a Vampire.~Menel

Nothing I do is influenced by Nogrod nor anyone else here. I'm alone and make my own decisions. You are correct that if I was a vampire I would do exactly that, but see something that looks like what a vampire would do often looks like what an innocent would do as well. I thought good points had been raised against Celuien, and I agreed. Though you will see that I consistently was on Legate's case yesterday, I voted for Legate, and I don't think that's going to change today.

Boro, I think you're a bit too accusing towards Shasta as he's a newbie.~Thinlo

Perhaps, you could be right. However, Legate's subtle defense of Shasta yesterday, and Shasta 'accidentally' leaving out Legate today looks more than simply coincidental to me.

As someone who's family history has been a wolf more than just once in the past, that is alarming behavior that shouts wolves! (or in this case vampires). The little defenses of partners and the very little interaction/failing to mention of partners.

Just because you find something to be a good thing doesn't necessarily mean others do. I was simply stating my opinion, not telling others what to do or not do.~Shasta

Quite true, no one has to agree with me. I call it as I see it. Maybe 'blind accusations' just cause confusion and make the vampires jobs easier...however I hardly think sitting around and just 'waiting' for some kind of evidence to appear on someone is hardly a better strategy. Therefor, getting people interacting, accusing, suspecting, has always been helpful to me, so I do it. I encourage others to do it and naturally anyone who suggests differently I think is a bit odd and needs to be looked into more.

I too am liking Gil-galad in this game. I've always found Gil to be someone who's got good instincts and can spot the enemy, but from his times in the past he looked random and I never really took him seriously. It's different now, and I kind of like it. I think we should all pay attention to his remarks here:

wow... now you say that you don't know why you voted me, just a friendly reminder, Every Werewolf game is different, the worst thing to do is to apply what you found out of people last game and bring it here, just about everyone acts differently in every game. Just because Glirdy(using you as an example buddy) was a wolf last game doesn't mean he is going to be a wolf again this game.

Edit: x-ed with everyone past Shasta's last post