Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Saucepan Man
Hey, where's your spirit, man? Brief reasons will do for now ...
|
Thanks mate!
But the only thing I wish to say right now is: cool down
Roa. You are either making a big mistake or then you earn to die as a vamipre you are... your case anyhow is just built on sham.
Your case is indeed just idiotic. And I know you've played on earlier occasions just counting on that - that there are enough players who don't think themselves and you can sway their votes. If you have gathered that support then good for you, but at least now (as in the previous game) you're barking at the wrong tree... So might you just learn if you're innocent? Otherwise I could understand your point well enough.
So just give me / us one reason why I would have played as I have done were I a Vampire! There is a difference between playing the baddie and the goodie and you know that. Trying to make a case on me then looks like vampiery. Nothing else can explain this to me then (you said you were insulted by the fact that I dared to suspect you slightly yesterDay. I can't see you as petty as to make a retaliation on that reason... so then your "retaliation" is of a villanous nature...). Sorry, but you're being revealed...
You propose that we should be assured that argumernts can win the game so give us one then and do not hide behind far-fetched suppositions and speculative ideas! Quit making these "a vampire might have done this" things and give some evidence you're so happy to rely on at the level of rhetorics. You play only on the level of rhertoric and have nothing solid to go for - even though you call for optimism about the solid things we have... Cut the crap, please. And don't fool us any more.
It's easy to build things on "X might have done this were he a Vampire".
I'll do one for you just for the fun of it tomorrow (RL).
Think
Roa, think... Don't be stupid.