[Legate of Amon Lanc]

...and then I'm going to bed. What I wanted to say to current situation, I said.

Originally Posted by Volo

BTW, Legate, you've been saying that you have sense in every post of yours. Could you please clarify.

Now, if you permit me, I was in temptation to get rid of you by one of the answers of, well, not Saruman, but Gandalf the White, but White is White, so we can say it could belong to me, more or less: "What? Speaking in riddles? No! A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young are wearying." I.e. if there is a "wise" person, he/she'll find the meaning in it. But a few short answers I'll give to you.

I don't want to go through all my posts so I'm answering just to where you had the question mark, I suppose you take those where you understand or agree with me as "okay". Only if somewhere clarification will be needed, I'll add it.

First post: In translation to normal, game language: Introduction on the first line. Then rightaway in-game: "Notice, we have four wolves, not three. And Mith mentioned another possible baddies aiding. (this was quite scary to me at that moment, because I thought there are just some other roles on the good side, but checking at the admin it indeed seemed that there might be some other baddies)" Etc, etc - please note only that it certainly was NOT point of it to say "Gifteds, come here and reveal yourselves". It was quite the contrary: "Much have I desired to see you... for you could be of the greatest help to us... Alas, I cannot, and I know that: there's too much at stake." This means "Gifteds, be quiet." Why would, anyway, anyone want the Gifteds to reveal? (apart from the Wolves, of course) All was ended with, as I said after in clarification to Ang, "Let's speak more, and if anyone else is here just watching and didn't speak, then please, speak up."

Second post: Quite short, in-character Sarumanic arrogance, but then naturally switching to the words meaning "Anguirel, either speak sense and not just unnecesarrily long in-role speeches, or be quiet, because Mith already said something (take care of double-lynching...) and you are still just in-role." Also, to that aided the fact that while I thought "first post is banter, with second the real speech might start" and Ang's short post between these first two of mine was about absolutely nothing, while even my first had some content, I expected Ang to say at least "Ah, Saruman... etc... And to what you said, I would like to mention that I agree/disagree/think you should speak more or something like that. After X roleplayers there are few of us who finally say something, so let's talk." He didn't do anything, he continued in banter. That was what I was replying to at that time.

Originally Posted by Volo

Fifth post: This is probably the post where suspicion rose. I really don't understand the first part, because, as I see it, you are accusing Ang for what you yourself are doing. You might have sense in every post, and so might Ang, the problem is that you can add the meaning to the post much later, when you are questioned. That's why I don't like in-out-character posts, in which you can later decide what's in and what's out.

If you understand me from what I said, I am NOT and once again for the last time NOT accusing Ang for doing what I was doing, because he was NOT saying anything where I WAS. I am not going to return to this, I said it more than enough times, I believe.

Sixth post: SpM I mentioned just to "mark my progress", for myself (this post was even a sort of monologue for me) as well for others, it's another way of saying that I haven't forgotten about him, also for that HE knows it.

Eighth/Nineth post, and generally all concerning Six: Since I was fairly sure of Ang being a Wolf, or Spm being a Wolf, or whoever but at least someone, and I really didn't see anything suspicious on Six, as I said earlier many times, I was fairly sure Six is innocent. This is also everything I am saying on that matter, as well as the prolonged issue mentioned above, I already explained it, so that's it. Of course I had a little 1% of being wrong and for that chance I prepared a funny line about eating Orc food, which, as it turns out, I didn't need to use.

The last two posts I am not exactly sure of if you have any problem with them or not? If yes, please explain more exactly. Or my brain is just already shutting down. Only:

Originally Posted by Volo

Weren't you the first to say that it was to leave no tracs?

No, I think you must've confused me with someone else. Aganzir and Anguirel, I believe, spoke of it before me, or something like that. At least one of them surely - Aganzir, I think.

So that's about it. I probably crossed with someone, but I am not going to read anything till tomorrow. Good night.

EDIT: Oh really, didn't cross with almost anyone! Nice. Good night.