[Volo]

Kath:

#25: Pure in-character. Ah, wait, no:

On that subject there is a point I would like to bring up but I may wait until tomorrow or even the next Day to do so, as it's one that can cause a first Day to descend into a flurry of arguments the likes of which we see every time.

What's this? Something to do with me and Aganzir?

#51: Changes mind about the quote above, if I understand her right.
Much ado about nothing. Or at least too much ado about barely anything. I'm really mystified how Kath turned such a post out of nowhere. No, I'm not saying that it doesn't say anything truthful. On the contrary, I'm saying that the post holds too much of the obvious. And especially how she congatulates people on how great "points" they have made looks suspicious. The "Nice Cuddly Wolf"? The only thing that really turns everything around is her vote for Rune, though Rune wasn't in real danger there and I'm pretty sure Rune doesn't mind being the "Martyr Wolf".

A hard post that one. One thing is certain: Kath used a lot of time on it. What do you, fellow innocents, think? (Wolves stay quiet.)

#146 : Hmm... I started off this analysis thinking of Kath as, well, anything, probably innocent, but now she's falling into the Wolf category pretty neatly. Anyway: Am I the only one who finds this post a bit plastic? As if Kath knew that Mith was going to be killed? Ok, the post doesn't come 2 seconds after the Daybreak, but still... Or am I just paranoid and unfamiliar with Kath's style?

Anyway, the part about "Newbie Wolves" raises my alarms the most. Gloating? The Wolves in truth all old times?

#177 : (On side note: So Legate saw Sixth innocent even because Sixth didn't start a bandwagon! ).

(Sorry if that's confusing, I know there are far too many he's and him's.)

No, that's not confusing, but what is confusing is that your thought s about Legate defending Sixth make zero sense. The ideas of what Legate would do is just too far fetched, I think that nobody in his right mind would claim somebody innocent because of those reasons...

I think Volo might be clutching at straws a bit there.

And I think that my analysis of Aganzir was damn good too. But alas, I regret it now... Actually this part is pretty much like what Kath is describing what Legate did about Sixth, seeing that Aganzir would probably die, Kath said that Aganzir is innocent (Not an accusation, just pointing out that the logic doesn't work.).

Rune still has my back up. His posts toDay have been just as empty of any susbtance and yesterDays. The one about the double-lynching was particularly useless, as it was something everyone knows, just as what he said about Gil was obvious.

And Mith or somebody pointing out the same obvious stuff isn't guilty? The way Kath targets Rune does make me wonder...

I think the most innocent thing Rune has done is not to change his vote from me. I really think that it was pretty irrelevant.

He also seems to be jumping on what other people say. A couple of people start talking about Brinniel and suddenly he thinks she's the most suspicious thing ever? Plus, having previously said that he isn't going to focus on Gil anymore he brings up that point about Gil posting differently again. Finally, when he votes his suspicions of Gil and Brinniel take a backseat to Mac, who hadn't yet been mentioned toDay.

But here's a point I agree with. Not so much the Brinniel part as the Gil-Galad part.

#229 : This post doesn't feel too evil, but I must disagree about Shasta. I'm not saying that he can't be a Wolf, but his thought that I'm what Legate is looks more like a simple mistake...

#243 : The obvious thought, can't really say that this looks suspicious.


On the whole:

I'm pretty lost here too. Kath seems to be the "Friendly Wolf" type if she's a Wolf, which is pretty probable. A lot of text and praise for barely anything.

The very strange obsession with voting Rune. Here it's obvious to think "Seer!" and do think that indeed. But if I'm right, there was no dream on Night 1.

Originally Posted by Rikae

Night One has begun. Wolves begin your fiendish plotting. Others, hold your horses.

A few contradictions I've marked in the analysis.

On the whole the tone isn't that suspicious as Kath seems to put a lot of effort into the game and her posts are readable and without too many unnecessary stylistic tricks that make you feel like the writer is a genious but in fact doesn't say anything. (But that's a minor detail conserning Wolves.)

I even went as far as reading through a few of Kath's posts from Oddwen's game in which Kath was the wrongly lynched Hunter.
In the current the style is completely different from this post, but comes close to the style here . Is Kath always praising people to the level of suspicious?


Xd with everybody since my last post. Goin out now.

EDIT: :O Didn't X-post with anybody! Speak up!