Quote:
|
Now declaring to vote in random (or random with a method) is the worst case. The second worst of the kind is to say you have a principle and you will follow it to the end like saying "I always vote for the loudmouths because I don't like to read so much" or whatever. Like Volo in a way seems to be doing and Menel in a way as well. When asked why did you vote for X you can always say "the principle I gave demanded it from me". The problem with this is that you kind of outsource the responsibility of your decisions to a principle.
|
Nogrod, thank you for pointing this out. Somehow I managed to forget this.
What I did yesterday was worse than the second way, it was pretty much of the forst case. A random throwaway vote. First of all because I didn't believe that
tgwbs would be lynched. And that being the week side of my method, people won't take me seriously. And just on a side note, the "oppositism"-method would be a great cover for a cobbler, at least a cobbler that has some skill in the business.
The "logic" I use applies
only to my own thoughts. I have a history of lynching only innocents with my own ideas. But I do believe that there are people who
do find the Wolves.
To the game itself:
First I thought that there wouldn't be a Wolf hiding in the
xyzzy voters. As I didn't think
Menel was a Wolf and
xyzzy was an easy lynch. Wolves could easily stay out of the frey.
Well, now that we find that
Menel was a Wolf after all, it changes everything and there might be Wolves all over the place (i.e. voting both
xyzzy and
Menel.
I find
Izzie's and
Nogrod's votes the most interesting at the moment.
Izzie could well vote so to save a follow friend. At the same time using her newcomerness as a shield but then making a mistake in jumping out to save a friend.
Nogrod has admited using this trick earlier, to vote for a fellow Wolf and to make a tie just after another Wolf votes for somebody else to put him into the front. Well, anyway, to do like happened now.
Though
Nogrod looks more suspicious than he usually does (his wierd first post and his first post on Day2 that moves the discussion to the roles and not who's guilty), I'll not throw him into the depth of the "suspicious"-list. (This because of the Wisdom).
I guess same goes with
Izzie...
And on the contrary,
Kath feels a bit too innocent...
EDIT: Xd with Legate