Just a quick look at people here. I'll be able to play more nearer the end of the Day but now need to make dinner and clean up before my father comers to visit us.
Gil - let's leave him be. The odds are that he is an innocent and then counts on our numbers. I do agree with
Volo here: if he is a wolf and wins he doesn't actually win. The moral victory would be ours then.
Boro - as I said let's see it with him toMorrow for the next Night will tell us a
lot about him anyway.
Aganzir and
Lommy - they both feel genuine but I must admit that they have more or less flown under my radars and I would need to change that. I hope get a klook at them later toDay.
Morm - it's good to see morm back on action after those oneliner Days. Not one I would be happy to vote toDay as he can be a useful villager. But I need to read him a bit more closely before making any judgements.
Volo - as odd as always
. He's one of those I find extremely hard to grasp (like Rune).
The Sixth - after
Isabell turned out a wolf I think it highly unlikely that Sixth is a wolf as well (two wolves trying to save their mate just minutes apart from each other). But if the wolves (or whatever baddies there are) don't know about each other it could be possible though.
Mith - I'm getting suspicious of (see my earlier post). I'm going to read her later toDay to see whether my suspicions are worth something.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aganzir
Nogrod, could you please explain these comments from Day 2? They keep troubling me.
Quote:
|
The familiar logic of all the baddies knowing each other vs. all the blind goodies doesn't work here. . . . So possibly not two sides but three.
|
To me it seems that you're saying "Hi, I'm a wolf, where's the other team? I know you're out there, we could co-operate." |
In the quote I was actually just reminding us that we can't probably interpret the Nightly kills in traditional manner as there is a chance that the wolves (godzillas, whatever) don't know each other or that there may even be three sides and thence the logic is different. Now I would only add that the very same thing adheres to our interpretation of the Day's voting as well...
Even as we don't know the exact structure of this game there assumedly are two sets of baddies ranging from 1-3 each side. If they could win in cahoots the game would be highly inbalanced against us. And why then there being two different camps if they can win together? And if they can't they will be rivals to each other. And that is good news to us.
There being an actual competition between the baddies would make the game more even as well: lots of baddies around but rivalling each other. I think that would sound like a
Spm game.
The only thing that kind of bothers me with this interpretation is that how come the baddies haven't killed any other baddies during the Nights? Just bad luck? That brings me to the question about who killed
Menel in the first place?
Boro said he did it and that sounds believable. But is he what he claims to be? Well, we'll see about that toMorrow.
Gah. Confusing...