It's funny
Boro that you have always been the one to tell that if it walks like one and talks like one then it is one... and now the parts seem to have changed.
I mean it's quite sensible to believe that you're an intelligent baddie able to make some drastic moves and we should make our deductions. Just look at the claims you have made and the different twists of rules and balance of the game they need to presume are true. So there would have been at least six baddies aided by a seer-baddie or something (7 baddies from 20 so more than 1/3) facing only a seer and the chivalric invincible assassin/hunter/ranger/superman-Boro!
Believable? I mean use your own standards this time as well...
And to add: quoting a known wolf isn't the most trustworthy of sources... so everything
Mith said yesterDay after she revealed must be read with a lots of caution. I wouldn't back any claim on them. Now how is it that you're doing it? An innocent would be very wary of using that kind of points to steer her/his thoughts as they most probably mislead in a way or another.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
And perhaps there was only one kill because the majority of the wolves had been killed?
|
Isn't this just what
Lommy (and I) have been telling you. That the wolves have passed out, they're dead, extinguished, ex-wolves, gone to meet their maker... not just resting as you wish to make us believe.
But good to have you around to discuss this. I think I have a much more clearer picture about the possibilities now after you have defended yourself. I'll be back a bit later toDay
PS. Yes, everyone can say they were visited by the pink Beavers sent by Radagast... so please. I think that one argument makes you look more bad than the last Night's happenings as such... If you were true indeed you would not have used such a point but if you were a baddie so near victory you might slip a bit just to gain your goal?
EDIT: X'd with Boro's last one