Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
Again, if anyone is saying that I can't protect myself and I'm making all of this up, why was there no wolf kill then?
|
Like I said, just because there's a real ranger who did protect you.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
Why in the heck would I spend my time killing the wolves when they were also doing my job if I was this bad lone bear?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Volo
If he's lying about the counter-attack skill, then why is Aganzir dead?? I really doubt that Boro would have chosen her as his target so it must have been a counter-attack.
|
I think that (as funny as it sounds) he might have thought that she seems the least wolvish and thus killed her, because I guess he'd like to keep the wolves around so that his revealing wouldn't backfire...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
Why would I bait the wolves into coming and attacking me at night?
|
Now
that is a fair point. I don't know. Maybe you do have some secret ability. Or maybe you thought your claim wouldn't be agreed with and as some people would suspect you the wolves would leave you around...? Or...? Anyway, even if that is a hole in my theory, I still think yours has even more holes.
I think a gifted wouldn't vote himself. Even if he was a hunter. On the other hand, it is difficult to see a bear voting himself either.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Volo
Well, have you forgotten the subject called Gil-Galad completely. Wouldn't that be an answer to why only one person died last Night?
|
A fair point as well. But I doubt
Sauce would have plagued this village by five wolves, a black priestess and a bear. Or even with five wolves and a priestess. I mean, it would be mathematically very unprobable that we would win if they got two kills per Night and we were to lynch five of them without double-lynches...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
However you are so certain this is the only answer that I am the sole bad guy therefor you kill me the village wins.
|
I'm not certain. I was certain in my first post toDay because I wanted to provoke a reaction from you and seems it worked well...
I'm open to other ideas, but right now I see my theory as the one that makes most sense and thus I believe in it. While the problems of my theory center around your personal behaviour that seems unbelievable according to my theory (or so you claim), the problems of others center around an unbelievable game structure and I think that's far worse a flaw.