[The Saucepan Man]

Originally Posted by Brinniel

I find it odd that SPM places Kath in the suspicious category before she even has the chance to speak.

The cards never lie.

Originally Posted by Brinniel

And his vote for Lommy...I cannot see a good reason behind it. Perhaps he could give us more explanation...

I could, but I won't. Not for now.

Originally Posted by Lommy

I would not like to lynch EC on the first day without a good reason, since they play so rarely and it's a pleasure to play with them ...

Yet you still voted for them without good reason. I would have thought that my "unreasoned" vote for you would give you a better reason to vote for me than them.

Originally Posted by Lommy

I've reread Sauce's posts and they don't seem so suspicious anymore.

Oh really. Why is that then? Perhaps because you don't want to vote for one who has voted for you?

Originally Posted by Rikae

Reading through the posts, the most alarming - or just the strangest - thing I can see is Lommy's behavior. Accusing those who accuse in jest is a classic wolf blunder - one I would consider too obvious, though, for either an evil or good Lommy to fall into.

Yes, that's part of it. But there is more.

Originally Posted by Rikae

SPaM's post seems to involve something more than banter - perhaps an excessive friendliness ...

Funny, because Lommy accused me of being "aggreeable". Yet I find that I have been distictly unagreeable and distinctly unfriendly thus far.

Originally Posted by Rikae

Nogrod even mentions not wishing to vote for someone who is amusing - while I understand it, this could be deadly in such a small group.

Quite so. His vote for Izzie was absurd and unhelpful. But that's a Day 1 Noggie for you.

Originally Posted by Brinniel

SPM is the only one I can draw suspicion from based on reasons I stated earlier. It would be a shame to lose him so early if he is innocent, but then again, he can be quite the treacherous baddie. And since I am out of time, I must rush and make my vote.

Bad, bad Brinn. But perchance this vote will not go well for you.

Originally Posted by Nogrod

I am a bit worried with Lommy's way of apologising her vote almost to excession.

Quite so. You should go woth your instincts, not with who you wish to see in the game in the Days to come.

Originally Posted by Kath

Perhaps it is the lack of a role as an outlet for her madness but her random accusations actually had some sense to them!

Surely you are not serious here. I doubt that even Durelin would agree with you on this one.

Originally Posted by Kath

Lommy - good first post talking about the possible number of wolves and also about the no execution thing.

Yes, a great first post, if you don't mind people who state the obvious just to look like they are saying something helpful ...

Originally Posted by Kath

Pretty normal for him by the look of things.

My posts have been anything but normal for me thus far. And intentionally so.

Originally Posted by Kath

Only problem is, he gave both the good and bad points of each card, thereby covering his back and not giving particularly definitive answers.

Yes, that was rather the point.