I'm a bit worried about
Kath and here are my reasons for it. Nb. it's not the fact that she voted me but because of the way she did it.
Here's
Kath's "argument" in full:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kath
Noggie ~ I'm tempted to try and kill him off already just to keep the number of pages down! Has posted nothing while posting a lot. Keeps calling for people to talk which, yeah, great, but we know that and after the third post asking for chat you don't really need to do it again. Plus, that post that concluded everyone he'd looked at was a possible balrog? I don't know, maybe it's just his playing style this game, but it's making me suspicious.
|
1. The argument of posting a lot. Sham in two ways. Firstly at that time I had posted quite moderately. Secondly she should know as a veteran to these games that the villages become absolutely boring after a few days if all the more active people are lynched & killed early on. And what's better place for baddies to be than a silent village? And if it was a joke? Joking that way and leading it to a vote is a bit too risky on Day1 for anyone actually interested about the fate of the innocents.
2. Posting nothing while posting a lot -argument. Just look what had been posted overall at the time I was online last night (RL). There wasn't much to say at that time (my last was post #16). So pretty ridiculous argument indeed. And if this wouldn't be a game I might be a bit insulted when someone says that my posting is noncommittal or unfruitful or not saying anything...
But yeah, it's a game so no problem there.
3. Seeing balrogs everywhere -argument. An innocent needs to see balrogs everywhere. Only by looking at the possible balrogs around oneself can one find hints about there actually being one there. It's only the balrogs who don't need to see possible enemies everywhere as they know where they are unlike us.
Kath knows this very well.
4. The argument of the playting style. Which basically is no argument on anything.
So why do I wish to bring all this forwards? Because all of
Kath's "arguments" are sham and she is experienced enough to know it. That means she has other motives to get rid of me in this game. Fabricating arguments like this to affect the village is most fishy indeed. Also I'm reading a malicious intent behind her words (especially points 1. & 3.).