We got a balrog but we lost the seer. Great and sad at the same time.
But how did they pick him? Did he leave any clues?
I have read
The Might's posts once again and there are a few things I'd like to share.
I said yesterDay that
The Might looked like he was betting on the winning horse all the time and thence looked suspicious. I must say he really did then. But if you are indeed the seer you don't wish to get suspected. So that's undesrstandable.
With a closer look I made an interesting find.
The Might had actually talked just about a few people. And there are interesting wordings & changes in his attitudes.
On Day1 he speculated as an example
Lhuna to make his point of reverse-reverse-reverse psychology and agreed with
Brinn bantering / serious posting -issue. He said
Rikae had a special way of starting a game and voted me on "Gondolindrim instinct".
He began Day2 by the following:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TM #86
Well, I must admit I feel I've been wrong about my last vote. I actually doubt Nogrod is a bad guy right now, just kinda feeling that. Yes, know it sounds somewhat stupid to change my mind so fast, but I hope I won't be wrong about this.
Nor do I think that Legate is bad. Looking through their past posts it doesn't seem there is any planning happening.
Hmmm...not sure what to believe of many others
|
Now my gut reaction is that he had dreamt of
Legate on Night1 (yes he had a dream on Night1) and of me on Night2. That would fit nicely what he said.
His second post offers us a new possibility for interpretation. He jumps pretty fast on my suspicion on
Mac - which was a good case *gloats just a bit* - but was just a well grounded suspicion. So was it that he had indeed had dreamt of
Mac and was happy to see someone giving him a ride to make a case against a balrog known to him? After that he continued hammering
Mac down (possibly strengthening the latter interpretation of his dreams). Then he goes defencive. He tells he had suspected
Mac already on Day1 and that he feels myself and
Legate are innocents.
Then he votes
Mac with the following:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TM
I am quite certain about my vote and also am suspicious about Kath, but I'm not entirely sure about that one.
|
I'm quite sure what he said about
Kath was not seer knowledge but his thoughts as a villager. But the wording "I am quite certain" looks like he knew indeed.
So what should we think about this?
Back in a minute.
EDIT: X'd with Legate
EDIT2: changed italics to underlining as the quotes are in italics anyway and thence can't be seen...