Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinlómien
Gimli himself (not just his weapon) was wounded in the battle of Hem's Deep: he got a (minor) wound on the head.
Like Morwen, I see no reason why Gimli should have died. To be realistic and nit-picky, it is far more astonishing that all the Hobbits survived having no military training or experience and being used to simple and peacuful life. I know; Hobbits were far tougher than they seemed, but it is still a bit odd. But that of course is part of the magic of the book and the Hobbits themselves. It would be a grim book if one of the Hobbits died or was seriously wounded.
As to the original Legolas question, maybe because it would have been unnecessary, as Morwen already said. Also, it would have taken attention from Frodo and Sam's wounds and the fact that Gandalf perished.
|
Well I didn't say Gimli should have died, I just found it odd. I, too, think it is odd that all the Hobbit's survived, but I am glad they did! In HoMe Tolkien was debating whether or not to kill off Pippin.
As to a distraction from the plot, I can't see that as a feasible reason. There are so many little things going on throughout the whole story that one wound would not really distract much.