[Nogrod]

There had been voices saying we shouldn't lynch Boro on Day1 (including my own when I said I wouldn't like to see Boro, Rikae or Mith go on Day1). When the actual voting began there were then these:

Originally Posted by McCab -10 min.

Boro seems to know what he's doing, and he raises good points. I would prefer it was not him lynched today.

Boro leading the tally with 2 against one at that time. That indeed takes McCaber apart from the rest in a way as he referred by name only to those two who had garnered votes so far (Boro and Gwath).

Originally Posted by Volo -7

Boro might be a Wolf, but I'm reluctant to voting him.

Boro 2 - Gwath 2 at that time. Volo also only referred to players who had garnered votes or talked about as possible options - and it was 2-2. Although no one had kind of voiced a desire to vote for Boro either at that time.

Originally Posted by Mith -4

I don't want Boro lynched.

Putting Gwath to 4 votes against Boro's 2. Quite unnecessary I'd say eg. overdoing it?

Originally Posted by Mac -3

I would really not like to see Boro go.

Gwath 4 - Boro 2. Now why?

Originally Posted by Lommy -2

it all feels wrong but voting Boro would feel even more so... *sigh*

It was already Gwath 5 - Boro 2. Looks like overdoing it...

Originally Posted by Mith -2

Maybe I should have gone for Mac but I feel more strongly about Boro's innocence than anyone's guilt....

Still Gwath 5 - Boro 2.

So looking at who tried to look nice justifying one's vote also with not wishing to vote for Boro this would make Mith, Lommy and Mac look the most suspicious with possibly Volo trailing behind.

McCaber is an interesting case here as it looks like he chooses between the ones who have garnered votes that far in a hurry. Now is this deliberate tactics - and why to vote for someone who has already gotten votes if the votes given are only three from fifteen when he begins his consideration? A wolfsy way of looking at things?

EDIT: X'd from Greenie onwards...