Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron the White
from davem
As I have said in several places here, because JRRT does not tell us in what Smaug was foiled in, its all conjecture and speculation. What is my speculation?
Smaug could have intended to destroy the bridge himself for sheer enjoyment and was thus foiled in that plan.
Smaug could have intended to trap fleeing townspeople on the bridge and had hopes of incinerating many with one quick blast and was foiled in that plan.
|
And, as several people have repeatedly said, this THEORY completly ignores the second half of the passage.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by STW
And, as I have repeatedly said, if it was his intention to go on the island he had ample space on the docks which are clearly even wider than the bridge. He did not do so.
|
And you have been repeatedly told why you cannot base such an assumption on the picture alone, especially where the text would suggest otherwise.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by STW
You infer that he intended to cross the bridge to justify the order to destroy the bridges. Even though that order is somewhat silly and poor military strategy against a fire breathing creature who is attacking you from the air.
|
One thing you forgot to mention - he actually
attacked from the air
after the bridges were destroyed, and after he was oh-so-mysteriously
foiled by this.
While the bridges were being destroyed he was getting from point A to point B through the air.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by STW
Its poorly, planned out and poorly written. Burn me at the stake for that. I have no doubt that if this were LOTR, JRRT would have fully fleshed it out so that it made sense.
|
That's your opinion and you are entitled to it. Excuse me for not burning you at the stake, but I have a five page essay on Browning due yesterday and three misbehaving children to deal with, so you'll just have to go without your martyrdom for the time being.
