Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron the White
That is a great spot to be in. Sounds like a great job.
|
It was not a job, it was a misadventure. Actually, I was offered a position as a Tolkien quest-writer in-game by Turbine (the company that produces
Lord of the Rings Online); however, I declined as it would have moved me to another state and would have only been a temporary position in any case. I suppose I might have jumped on it if I were younger and without a family, but that was not in the equation.
In addition, I got physically ill at the lore atrocities evident in every fiber of the game, and have not played since prior to the game's official release due to mental health considerations (thus retaining what little sanity I still have).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron the White
One thing that I am not clear about. The game is licensed by Saul Zaentz through rights he has purchased from UA decades ago. Even if the license the game people have prohibit the mention of certain First and Second Age things, why would that necesarrily mean that the rights Zaentz posesses would limit him in the same way? It could simply mean that Zaentz wants to limit the scope of rights to others and he himself is not under the same limitations.
Or the limitations placed on the games license could simply be to limit the scope of content to events already in the films and Zaentz or New Line does not want new ground covered if they themselves have not yet done it.
All this is theory of course.
|
Okay here are the licensing commandments as I now understand them:
1) If references appear only in the
Lord of the Rings or
The Hobbit,
thou shalt use them.
2) If references appear in both the actual text of
LotR and
TH, and in
The Silmarillion (or other Tolkien publication controlled by the
Tolkien Family Trust, such as
UT or
HoMe),
thou shalt use them.
3) If references appear in
The Silmarillion or other Tolkien publication, but not in
LotR or
TH,
thou shalt not use them.
4) If references appear in the
LotR Appendices, but not in
The Silmarillion or other Tolkien publication,
thou shalt use them.
5) If references appear in the
LotR Appendices, and in
The Silmarillion or other Tolkien publication, but do not appear in the actual text of
LotR or
TH,
thou shalt not use them.
Again, as you pointed out Mr. White, this may merely be a measure of control Tolkien Enterprises has exerted on the users of the gaming license (in this case Turbine, but also Electronic Arts, which controls the X-Box and PSP gaming license); however, as litigious as the Tolkien Family Trust is known to be (as you know, they are currently suing Newline...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/12/bu...vie.html?fta=y), it is perhaps wise on Tolkien Ent's part to ensure that there is not the slightest hint of impropriety in their handling of their licenses in regards to the exclusive rights Tolkien Family Trust exerts over what remains of Tolkien's legacy. Or, perhaps more to the point, they are limited by copyright law against using references to
The Silmarillion (unless specified) within their license.
After all, even though Tolkien Enterprise's licensing rights are granted in perpetuity, they can be revoked by the courts (which I am sure would please Christopher Tolkien, and be the crowning achievement of his curmudgeonly struggle for control of his father's legacy).
P.S. It is interesting to note that Games Workshops PLC is the only company currently that holds permissions from both Tolkien Enterprises and the Tolkien Family Trust to merchandise products. The permissions granted by the Tolkien Family Trust is limited to one single product: the game figurines of Khamûl the Easterling (as you know, the name Khamûl does not appear in the text of LotR of The Hobbit).