View Single Post
Old 05-05-2008, 04:27 AM   #108
Thinlómien
Shady She-Penguin
 
Thinlómien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 8,093
Thinlómien is wading through the Dead Marshes.Thinlómien is wading through the Dead Marshes.Thinlómien is wading through the Dead Marshes.Thinlómien is wading through the Dead Marshes.Thinlómien is wading through the Dead Marshes.Thinlómien is wading through the Dead Marshes.
Some things I noted.

This (in)famous quote,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lhuna
As for the others, Volo is a lost explorer, Agan is sweet and innocent (or so she claims), Gwath is a guilty lawyer and is likely to ignore Legate's plea for insanity, and Oddwen is crazy and innocent.

So my pine cones tell me.
I think, points to Oddwen's inncence. Especially combined with this rather contradictory quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lhuna
Oddie's behaviour feels normal to me, however unsettling her words may be.
At least I feel like concentrating my vigilance elsewhere (not on Oddwen, that is) for a day or two.

But actually, on the other hand, she might have dreamt of Gwath and found him guilty. Apart from that guilty lawyer -thing, there's this
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lhuna's vote post, underlining by me
It must be Gwath's disadvantage at this point that I've never played with him before, so I don't know if he's being his usual self, but that's the way the cookie crumbles.
That could be it, couldn't it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwath, underlining mine
However, Nogrod, you were awfully quick to identify my post as "wolvish"? You took no convincing whatsoever, so either you are trigger-happy and innocent, as Lhun said, or you really do know whether I am innocent or guilty. And THAT looks suspicious, because the only way you could know that is if you are a wolf yourself.
That was oddly phrased, for sure. Why say "whether I am innocent or guilty" if you're innocent? Wouldn't it first occur to an innocent to write "-- you really know my role" or "-- you really know I'm innocent" (although that latter phrasing would make less sense in the context)?

This comment of Legate's is quite odd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legate
In short: As you may have noticed, those who stay in shadows and say nothing are likely not to be examined by me at all. What does that mean? That everyone should speak to the matter! (Yes, someone had to say it )
It sounds suspiciously like he's making an excuse for ignoring a slip-under-the-radar fellow wolf.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
Only after reading a few comments I realised Mith had actually said she's an ordo. Now all of us who have played with her know she doesn't like to lie whatever the case. It's part of her charming personality. But I'm also feeling a bit uneasy with a situation where someone will be automatically looked upon as an innocent just because she says she is. I mean a few of you have already kind of declared her innocent just because of that.
This could be a wolf trying to stop people trusting in an innocent.

Nogrod's suspicion and vote of Lhuna seemed quite opportunistic.
Nerwen's seemed innocent.
Gwath's seemed a bit eyebrow-raising-worthy but not that bad really.
But actually Legate, who didn't even vote Lhuna, looks the worst in this light. His suspicion of her comes rather from behind the corner and seems a little feigned.

Okay. I'm suspecting Nogrod, Gwath and Legate, but find it very improbable that they would form the wolf trio. Some two of them could be partners in crime but not all the three of them, it would be too insane.
Kath feels vaguely evil, based on her posts both ysterDay and toDay...

I have not reread toDay's posts since I didn't have time, but I will do that later.
__________________
Like the stars chase the sun, over the glowing hill I will conquer
Blood is running deep, some things never sleep
Double Fenris
Thinlómien is offline   Reply With Quote