My first inclination is that there's got to be something going on around
Lommy,
Legate, and
Nogrod. There seems to be a great deal of reactionism and righteous indignation and even a few flippant remarks, which are used to brush off accusations without giving them due consideration.
Nogrod and
Legate feel (yeah, yeah, I know) more wolf-like than
Lommy at this point.
Nogrod looks bad because he has been right in the thick of everything since Day 1.
Legate seems serpentine and sneaky - rational, but quietly twisting arguments and words (both
Nerwen and
Lommy called him on this).
Lommy's posting style seems more relaxed and casual than the other two. This could be a carefully studied act, but I am not prepared to vote against her yet.
However, it might just be that these three players stand out the most because they have been the most vocal. When I've played before, it seems like while there might be one wolf out in the open (i.e. among
Lommy,
Nogrod, and
Legate), the other two are usually hiding among the quiet players.
Oddwen looks the worst of the quiet to me - but you all seem to be convinced that
Lhuna found her innocent? To me, her sparse, non-involved voting/posting pattern seems like that of either a scavenging wolf or an irresponsible innocent.
Volo's explanation of his vote makes sense. It doesn't make me happy, but I have to admit that his reasoning makes sense.
I have to go try to work up a case against one of my suspects before I vote.
Lots of reading to do.