Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Isabelkya
If they had scried the new Ranger, we would've known about it. Both wizards scrying the same person during the night = death from too much magic. Which leaves the Hunter and GW. Why choose a shot in the dark with trying to scry the GW whom they may not know, when they have a supposed hunter out in plain view?
|
How exactly would we have known about it? Have we known about any of the gifted, like which ones we have or how many, this entire game? I don't understand what the point about both wizard scrying the same person=death, since that wouldn't stop the GW from trying to get another gifted to replace Mac. As for the EW, I find it unlikely that they would try to scry for the gifted when they could just attack and kill them with wolves. The EW, having only 3 wolves last Night, would have been looking for a wolf to turn, not a gifted to de-gift. She wants those four kills. EW scrying is for wolf making, not gifted/GW hunting. That's what wolves are for.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Isabellkya
Oh really. If my post was erroneous, then I believe yours is as well.
|
I also corrected myself
here. Read the whole way through before you respond Izzie. It's usually the best way to go about.
Of course, none this explains your two votes for me with out any previous suspicion mentioned. So, tell me, what was that all about?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brin
Roa: The problem I have with Roa is that she was the first one to quickly believe Rikae in her claims as the GW. She backs away to "if" later on, but still openly defends her. That makes me nervous, as I can't understand how she (or anyone else) could've seen truth in that claim...it just seemed faulty to me. But would a wolf (or EW) be so bold? Typically I'd say no, but Roa's known to be bold...
|
Um, no, I didn't. I was one of the people questioning her from the start. In fact, I never said we should believe her at all. I simply believed that the best way to tell if she was telling the truth was to lynch Legate. That's how we usually test the seer. After phantom revealed, I was more inclined to believe her over him, for obvious reasons, but I still never fully placed my turst in her.
And oh for heaven's sake,
Nilp.
Now, my own analysis of Nilp fits nicely with him being a wolf. And of course this self-voting thing makes my blood boil. I'm not certain we can trust phantom, but again, I think the best way to test him out is to go ahead and lynch Nilp. If Nilp isn't a wolf, we'll know for certain that phantom is evil. If he is, well, we'll have another wolf down. Which if there are only three wolves now, we'll only have one kill tonight. If the ranger did well, then we'll still keep it down to four wolves.
And of course, Nilp's not even trying to wriggle out of it. (Should that be considered honorable in this game?)
I won't be back until an hour before deadline, and I'll only have a few minutes then.
++Nilp
Because he's not even trying to hide it.
Edit: Four wolves for two kills, not four kills.....