So
Lalaith it had to be then... that's too bad as she made sense. But also an excellent choice from the wolves. I mean there are certain patterns in wolf-kills even if people may consciously try to avoid them or try to mislead others by acting differently every once in a while. So some people just go for getting the strong or loud players out for maximum effectivity, the others go for sportiness and kill the quiet, some go for the "no-tracks left behind" and others for maximum confusion, and all go out for the seer. And many of us know what to think or where to look, if we see certain kind of pattern emerging from the kills.
Now
Lalaith seems to be a pick about anyone of those stereotypes could have made and which could point at any direction.
Now let's look at the next scenario which might be the one which the wolves would like us to come up with:
Lalaith voted for
the phantom and just insisted on him without too many arguments. So
tp is a wolf and they thought
Lalaith is the seer...
The phantom voted for
Lalaith (though overtime) to make himself look better toDay - just a thing
tp would be able to think already in the end of Day1.
Fine and dandy. But at least for now I think it's not the case. It's just a bit too neat. The seer had a dream on Night1 and from all the other 17 she picked the lupine phantom and went for him with a "hunch" and speaking more of "cobblerism" to hide her seerdom. But the wolves thought they had caught her and thence
tp voted her to be better off toDay and then they killed her.
Somehow I don't buy that. At least yet.
So maybe it was because
Lalaith didn't have any specific suspicions and only voted with her hunch so the kill leaves no track? And it could have been done by anyone...
... and it might point at
tp, almost frame him... so who's the most annoyed with him?
What other leads do we have toDay?
There were five votes for
Kitanna and it would be an interesting thing indeed if there were no cobblers or wolves in there. Not perhaps in the early voters as it is clear lynching
Kit was against their own good (loosing a free "one-villager-down") but maybe later, when it was looking quite clear
Kit would be lynched anyhow so they would have tried to take advantage of the obvious outcome (
Nerwen, maybe already
Nilp?).
Those trying to sway the
Kit-lynch early on, eg. those trying to make the lynch more profitable to the wolves, should be ones to be looked at more closely as well toDay. That means basically
Lommy,
Greenie and
Dury.
And even if I think about everyone not voting / posting on Day1 came forwards in the discussion thread explaining their situations I still think it was outrageously too many who went through the Day1 with giving us no or very little clue about themselves. This is no personal disclaimer or anything like that. I'm one of those who always declares that we should really trust what others say and that the game depends on trust in each other's words and deeds outside the game (and distrust for about anything said inside the game). So we just had tough luck this time with 1/3 of the village either not posting or not voting. That's a bit too much even if we can't do anything about it - and it gives the baddies the advantage.
So let's speak toDay, all of us...
EDIT: X'd from Eönwe's first post onwards...