You still approve,
Fea?
That's wonderful. Problem is I have no idea what you're approving at this point.
You see, yesterday I was quite certain that you were the Seer and were running a brilliant double edged ploy.
I was quite confident that you had dreamed of me and knew me to be innocent, or at the least a non-Wolf, but in order to appear quite unSeerish to the WWs and in order to draw Cobblers out you painted me "guilty as sin".
It seems to me that
Mith-Cobbler might have bit on it with her dedication to preserving me, and perhaps
Form as well with his crazy Cobblerish attack on me. And I think
Nerwen caught it as well, but she seemed to be hesitant until she got something clearer from you. Which makes me think that
Nerwen is innocent.
So anyway, that's what I was talking about when I said this to you-
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by me
I understand that it can be a rather good idea to ruin one's credibility with certain members of the village for the sake of protection, but isn't there a huge risk of backfiring?
|
I was saying that it was a great idea to point heavily at me to ruin your credibility with the WWs (make you look unSeerish), but that I was worried it would backfire, meaning that if you were killed during the Night the village would be sure to lynch me the next day.
But obviously I was
completely off on part of that scenario, seeing as
Gwath was the Seer.