Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Looking at the list Brinn kindly provided, I'm inclined to agree with tp that Gwath probably dreamt of Mith and Groin. I think that simply "innocent" looks like a rather seerish comment. I don't understand Brinn's opinion that he would have hid his real dreams under cobbler-names - that's too vague, and besides, he must have realised that him naming two people just "innocent" is going to make people assume he dreamt of them. Seers take things like that into account.
|
But why would the seer quickly list off his dreams as innocent when he can't be sure if they're ordos or cobblers? By listing someone off as innocent it would give more of a message to trust that person rather than just not lynch them. While if he listed his dreams as cobblers, we'd know not to lynch them but at least not necessarily trust them.
Though the main reason I'm guessing
Durelin and
Greenie to be his dreams among the four is because they seem more likely seer picks. Both girls are quite sneaky as wolves, especially
Durelin, and if I were the seer I'd pick them. I suppose there's a possibility
Mith was dreamt of Night 1 but she did not look wolfish enough at all to be picked Night 2 in my opinion. And
Groin...considering his low level of activity, I don't see why he'd be dreamt of over other players.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shasta
I also think it's folly to assume so quickly what Gwath's dreams must have certainly been.
|
I agree with you. What I wrote about
Gwath's dreams is pure speculation. I could be wrong. So could everyone else. We just can't know for sure. But I wanted to point my thoughts out because it is a possibility.