What's this?
I'm actually not dead?
Unheard of! Absurd!
Or, at least, according to the phantom's calculations of yesterday, I must surely be a cobbler, right?
The consensus seemed to agree with him.
I'm not dead.
So....
Clearly, I'm not a cobbler.
Because the wolves don't eat cobblers if they know them (unless they're trying to confuse the village), and the cobbler-killer does kill... and he didn't last night...
And I was the consensus cobbler-probable.
And I'm not dead?
Does that all make sense?
Of course it does.
Now, the real question is...
Why didn't the cobbler-assassin kill me?
There is, of course, another logical answer...
The cobbler-assassin didn't think I was a cobbler. And while this doesn't exonerate me, but rather leaves me in the "who knows?" category, it should perhaps at least give the phantom-esquely confidant reason to believe that I'm not the only one who doesn't think I'm a cobbler.
And... on another note:
I really do apologise for my limited involvement... but I probably should have known better that to agree to stick with the late start.
On the other hand, I could just be using this because it's a ploy, and I don't normally think to use ploys.
Ploys are good: they irk the phantom.
And I really do love irking the phantom.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|