[Durelin]

Ooh, look at the attention I'm getting. Seriously, though...I never get this much attention when I'm actually a wolf...

Anyway...before I get into the whole "I promise I'm not a wolf guyz <3" thing...on to a Nog-centered post, because I just have to respond to him.

Originally Posted by Nog

I would really like to hear from you Gwath-voters why did you think him a baddie

My vote for Gwath and Day 1 was mostly out of spite for the Kitanna thing, and actually because I purely didn't like his attitude. I warmed up to him a little more on Day 2, perhaps simply because more people seemed interested in him. I am naturally stubborn about "going with the flow." Which makes me think of my comment about me going with the flow on the Kitanna vote if I was a wolf. I don't know if I could have brought myself to do it, but I feel like I would have liked to, because it was just so...easy.

And as we see now, it was a cobbler who suggested the whole idea.

Originally Posted by Nog

She protest the Kit-lynch saying it only gives us one more day to play and says that's silly. But she doesn't say why not take one more day or why is it silly.

It was silly because there was no point to it! It was a boring, toss out of a Day. It extended the game by a Day, but made Day 1 completely pointless (yes, I know some people will argue that it is anyway, but at least normally there are more interesting dynamics besides people arguing principles. I mean, really, it was just one huge distraction! And the rest of the game people will still hold it against those who disagreed with them. ...See??).

Originally Posted by Nog

Now what I say in that quote is that there should be baddies in the Kitanna bandwaggon. Then Dury goes on "disagreeing" by saying that that were she a wolf she would have considered "going with the flow" eg. voting Kit. And then she says: "I'm really going to have to try to not focus on the people who neatly went along with the Kitanna lynch"???

Yes, I see I focused on one part of what you said. I'd say I was responding to all the "a wolf or cobbler have no reason to want to vote for/lynch Kitanna" going around. I don't even know at this point if you actually said things along those lines, but I thought you had.

Originally Posted by Nog

I mean the way she tries to downplay the possibility of Lalaith's death having to do with tp

I'm sorry, I feel the need to downplay anything having to do with tp. I don't like talking about him at all. Especially when everyone's saying "oh, the seer must dream of him!"

Originally Posted by Nog

She ends the post as confusedly as the post had been all the time by saying that I made a case against Groin

Well of course my opinions are going to be confusing to you if you don't like them.

Originally Posted by Nog

On #201 she suddenly becomes sharper and brighter with comments against Fea's poor / hasty judgements like:

Because the former post was a post of emotion regarding the Kitanna-lynch-fiasco.

I mean, I feel pretty stupid for somehow not seeing what Nogrod really thought about the Kitanna-lynch (See? My thoughts have been tainted for the rest of the game! Thanks Mith.), but it seemed to me on Day 1 he pretty much stayed out of it, and then on Day 2 his opinions seem mixed (but of course I'm not going back and looking at posts...). Okay, maybe I just don't like people being neutral-ish.

Something random not me attempting explaining myself or talking about Nog: So Greenie sealed Gwath's fate (in a tie, the last person to get the highest number of votes is lynched in this game), and phantom put him over the top. Now, I have to talk about him, because I wonder if this is truly a "for show" vote (edit: or an extra-padding vote). Another interesting thing is that he could have voted for Lommy, if he was aware of Mith's vote for Lommy and made her the lynchee instead of Gwath if he wanted.

Originally Posted by Brinn

But why would the seer quickly list off his dreams as innocent when he can't be sure if they're ordos or cobblers? By listing someone off as innocent it would give more of a message to trust that person rather than just not lynch them. While if he listed his dreams as cobblers, we'd know not to lynch them but at least not necessarily trust them.

I have to agree with Nogrod and tp on the most likely seer dreams, because listing people as 'innocent' was the only certain thing he did. Everyone is aware that the seer actually can't tell if the person is a cobbler, he doesn't need to specify that. Listing people as cobblers as well was very smart, because once revealed as the seer we know that is very ambiguous but it also certainly covered up the fact that he was listing two people as innocents after two nights. Very nicely done (if we're right).

Omg so long!! Two pages worth of confusing...ness!