[Thinlómien]

Originally Posted by Nogrod

But let me add that toDay they look more like cobblers both of them trying to fill the thread with things that don't actually help us eg. speculating their mutual interpretations of what the other thought about this and that and all that other stuff. And with Eönwe already going along with that speculation it seems they are succeeding...

Well that indeed is true. Or then maybe one of them is a wolf and the other is a cobbler? Somehow, all their chattiness makes me feel that they can't be both all nice and innocent, but on the other hand, if there are two people who would act like that when innocent, it's Fea and tp...

I find it funny that Nogrod complains about others rewriting his posts and then he goes and semi-rewrites a post of mine.

Originally Posted by Brinn

I suppose there's a possibility Mith was dreamt of Night 1 but she did not look wolfish enough at all to be picked Night 2 in my opinion. And Groin...considering his low level of activity, I don't see why he'd be dreamt of over other players.

Why not Groin on Night2? He was practically sleeping under everybody's reindeer and it would have been difficult to get information of him in any other way. Also, if you remember, he posted this enthusiastic post about having a case against a wolf on the admin thread around then, that might have made Gwath raise eyebrows enough to check him.

Nogrod's Durelysis is weird. He writes it as if Durelin should/would have known the roles of those who are dead by now. It is odd.

Also, the way Nogrod first suspects Durelin, then concludes he can't be sure after the analysis, and then proceeds on making up this point that semi-proves her innocence is rather troubling. It looks like a wolf's attempt to stop suspecting a mate in a way that it doesn't look too fishy. I'm inclined to think Nogrod would do such thing exactly like that: gradually and by analysis to make it reasonable, not just say "she doesn't feel that guilty anymore". And he might have had a reason to stop suspecting his fellow too: unless I'm mistaken, there has been an increasing suspicion of Dury and if it started to look troubling to a fellow-Nogrod, he would of course have to stop suspecting her as he indeed was one of the main advocates of lynching her and in a game with just two wolves, they can't afford losing each other very early. (Hey, even Nogrod's "making a point" castaway vote for Durelin makes sense if they're fellows!) Okay, I won't get too excited about this theory yet. I would have to look through all their posts to form a proper opinion. I know they've been kind of against each other more or less the whole game, but I'm not sure if the wolves would be that bold. (On the other hand, Nogrod and Durelin are the sort of people that would dare to play it bold.) Well, this certainly gave me something to think about.

Originally Posted by tp

Unless the rules have changed, I think the number of WWs is the only thing that determines the outcome.
WW numbers = villager numbers, then WWs win
WW numbers = 0, villagers win

And the cobblers are counted to the village numbers, right? Because, I've known them to be counted to the ww numbers (which definitely wouldn't be the case in this game anyway, I think) or them being counted to neither.

Kath's absence bothers me. Where have you been, gal? I know she's not a loudmouth but she tends to post more. She's sleeping under my reindeer, and I don't like it.

Originally Posted by Eönwë

Or maybe she voted for his packmate, and he needed to get rid of her. Maybe he thought (whatever he says he did) that Mith was the seer and had found them both out. She just needed to keep him happy while she went after Lommy.

Wait? Are you saying that the wolves killed Mith last Night because they thought she was the seer? That is a rather shaky theory: Gwath the Seer was already dead by then, so the wolves would have known that no one else is a seer. But then again, I don't think I got the point of your theory in the first place, so maybe I've just misinterpreted your words... Or are you intentionally not making sense... cobbler?

And lastly, what's up with Form? He confuses me. I think he just can't be innocent. But whether he is a cobbler or a very bold and crazy wolf, I don't know...


edit: xed with Kath - good to see her around