Greenie has got a point. The phantom/Shasta is quite odd. Both based on assumptions which the other plainly disagrees with and argues back with even more assumptions. Wel, obviously some of each person's points made sense and were backed up, but some were just things to throw at the other.
Now, I'm not saying that one of them is a wolf, but there is a chance that one may be a cobbler (But you never know with tp). Anyway, of the two, phantom does raise better points, but still, he is assuming too much.
edit: x-ed with Kath
|