Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Okay, but how can anyone be that secure?
|
Yeah, that's what I worry about. The fact is it looks like an excellent WW ploy were he and I WWs. If he gets me lynched then
Shasta must be innocent right? And if he gets lynched then I must be innocent, right?
But that's
not what's going on, I can tell you. I would never allow something so reckless. I am in favor of bold, but not obvious and reckless.
So I sort of feel like I'm being set up. Yeah, I guess I am kind of taking this personally.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
We've got a couple of hours. What are you two up to?
|
Heh heh... Well, in games past it has come up that I take immense pride in being one of the only players that lies more as an innocent than as a WW. I think it's due to my sense of sportsmanship. I feel that the WWs, as the attackers, should be somewhat sporting. Where as the innocents being attacked should be allowed to do anything they please to catch the beasts.