[Boromir88]

Boromir88: I still see him as sensible and not very supicious. I wonder if that's partly because he's been defending me. Hmm...I have a habit of trusting people who defend me...I better be careful...~Brin

Well, I'm not looking for any sort of alliance (despite what Rikae says ). When I have no sort of gifted information, my only hope of getting a wolf is putting my trust in certain people. I genuinely think I can trust you and Mith, and so far you've done nothing to make me think otherwise. It's not like I'm looking for some sort of tribal pact where we agree not to vote for eachother. I might not agree with who you suspect, you probably don't agree with mine, but generally I trust you're being helpful, in a good way, thus you're innocent. If you're a wolf, congrats you've fooled me, next chance our paths cross we'll see if you can do it again.

Nogrod's known for wild conspiracies/bluffs, but after going back through Brin's posts, I don't even think his suspicions against Brin have made it to the ballpark:

I don't think anyone has said that. But if you're a wolf and saw Kath coming out of the blue just stating her suspicion & vote, you might think she could be the seer. And seers will have to go whatever the cost - even if it means the death of the seer frames one wolf. The seer is too dangerous not to be killed at the first possible instant.~Nogrod

In my post 150 I specifically told Brin to check out my theory that she's a wolf, thought Kath was the seer who dreamed of her, and thus killed her; or the wolves were setting her up. You are referring to Brin's post 154, where she responds to the post I made, specifically asking her what she thought about that theory. Your insistance that Brin brought it up out of nowhere looks strange.

Understandably you feel an urge to purify your name and so you try to come up with every possible reason why the theory doesn't hold. Then you come up with a) I wouldn't kill someone for just voting me & b) and the seer wouldn't have dreamt of me anyway...

Now these surely might be things you could come up with and defend both of them. It's only that bringing them up together looks kind of fishy. I mean if you were an innocent you wouldn't probably think it that way, if you get what I mean.~Nogrod

If you're insinuating that she pre-planned the defense over night, I didn't get that impression at all. It's not like she mentioned this "defense" right off the bat, at the beginning of the day, she responded to me (it looks like about 24 minutes after I had asked).

And to add one small thing more; if you're an innocent why do you speculate about yourself being dreamt of in that fashion? If you're an innocent a seer dream means you're a known innocent by now. It's not something you should be afraid of or in need to convince others that has not happened - or that you would not expect that it has happened...

This really makes no sense, Kath wasn't the seer, and thus Brin was defending herself against my "theory," that she was a wolf and thought Kath was the seer. You're making it sound like she's been stressing "I wouldn't kill someone simply because they voted for me, and I wouldn't be a seer dream on night 1 anyway." If she was, then I'd say you raise a really good point, but the only time she has said her "defense" was when I asked her at the beginning of the day and when you've brought it up again.

Right now I'm unsure about Gwath and Nogrod. I don't like the way Nogrod went after Brin earlier today, because I think it's way out there. But I really don't like Gwath's last post against Nogrod. His primary reasons are from Day 1:

1. Nogrod is inclined to find me guilty because I am making assertions about other people, which I profess to not doing when I am a wolf, playing "low-key."

That's something he said at the beginning of Day 1, and I'm sure he'd admit were pretty weak. I mean you're not going to find any "quality" reasons to vote for someone on Day 1 and this was something Nogrod pointed out early.

2. According to Nogrod, it is strange for me to profess to "thinking on-screen."

Again something Nogrod pointed out early, and I'm not sure how that makes him a wolf.

3. Because I claim to be a low-key wolf, my statement in a later post that I am not trying to fly under the radar - in other words, not trying to play low-key - looks mighty suspicious.

Goes back to the "low-key" argument.

He makes some good points, but I disagree that the wolves HAVE to kill whoever they think the seer is right away, even if it means casting heavy suspicion on a fellow wolf.

Umm, no they do.

Overall: Nogrod banters a bit, makes some good points, posits interesting theories, and seems hell-bent on finding me guilty one way or another.

Yes, a little over-reaction there?

edit: crossed with Nerwen