Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aganzir
She suspected werewolves would just try to lay low and vote innocents for reps because "it's more probable that a village lynches an innocent anyway." But what if not? I don't like such generalized assumptions. In my opinion, speculating about things like wolf tactics (or what roles there might be) don't lead anywhere. There are so many possibilities. About that the blame cannot be put entirely on Lommy, though, since it was I think phantom who started on the subject.
|
Intentionally or unintentionally, you're misinterpreting and misrepresenting me again. There's truth in what I said, but it was a sort of sarcastic comment, not a well-thought speculation about the game.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agan
I don't understand Lommy's negative attitude towards filibustering. Do you really think there are no advantages to it? It might create chaos, yes, but it might also be of some use.
|
I already replied to that. Please point out just one good use for it and I might change my mind.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agan
She expresses concern about Agan-Brinn & Legate-phantom alliances because they are a good way to buddy up with fellow villagers. What's so curious about them? How are they a great way to buddy up?
|
I think it's always curious when two people express mutual trust in ww game and on Day1. They're a great way to buddy up because one gets a nice warm feeling when someone says they trust them more than anyone else in the village. Really, why do you have to ask these things? Soon you'll probably ask "why does suspicious behaviour indicate someone's a werewolf (or possibly a gifted)?"
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aganzir
If you're worried about wolves voting one another in order to become reps, I can understand that, but what does it matter? It's still so early that we can afford to lose innocents.
|
I did not say that! I'm more worried of wolves buddying up innocents.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aganzir
Oh what makes you think so? Why not two? Three? Four? None at all? Why one?
|
Because you're so obviously wolvish while the others are not. But no, seriously, it's just a number that occured to me. I'm not saying there couldn't be more, but like I already said, I think a majority of the wolves would prefer laying low and not getting elected.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agan
The result is that I suspect Lommy and it annoys me because I feel I suspect her just because of the way she is. I also find myself unable to compare this Lommy to any Lommy I know from the previous games. However I wouldn't probably suspect her half as much if not for those carefully self-consciously careless trying-to-say-nothing-or-at-least-sound-normal answers. They vaguely remind me of the pathetic Dueling Wizards wolf me who was trying to avoid suspicion and accusations when they kept piling on me.
|
If it helps you, it annoys me too.
And I so much dislike your description of my answers because I feel so utterly wronged because I'M NOT DOING THAT!!!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agan
I don't know what to do with Lommy.
|
Vote me, and get me lynched as an innocent on Day1 for the second time in a row and ensure I will get you lynched at least thrice on Day1 just to settle it...
edit: xed with Nog, Cab and Mith