Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nog
Now tp, you're either an innocent who tries to insult me saying that as a wolf I couldn't come up with a case out from nothing.
|
Wrong. That comment meant that you couldn't come up with anything because there wasn't in truth anything to come up with. I never said that you couldn't fake it in a believable way.
I think you're misunderstanding my distrust of you. I'm suspecting you not on any sort of slip, or logical contradiction, but rather on the attitude that I am attempting to read behind your posts. Two people can say the same exact thing and have entirely different attitudes.
Example:
Person 1 and 2 both voice suspicion of person 3. But when I read their posts I interpret them like this-
1- I'm an Ordo that doesn't know who to suspect. Right now Person 3 looks suspicious to me.
2- I'm a WW and I want you to lynch wrong. Person 3 looks like a good target.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nog
You know it as well as I do that neither you or me, or Boro, or Lommy, or... would vote a contributing player out on Day1 unless there was a severe case to be made against that one.
|
Indeed. I'm not suspecting you for not going after or voting for one of us on Day 1. I'm suspecting you because when I read what you say it reminds me of what I'd say if I were a WW.
That's what all this is based on
Nog- what I'm hearing behind the words. I could be completely wrong, because no two people think exactly alike. If I can I'm going to go back to a game in which you are innocent and read it a bit and see if I can get a better feel of how you talk and such.
I'm not ready to hang you now, but I don't trust you enough to make you a Rep either. We'll see as the day unfolds which way I am swayed.