Quote:
|
Originally Posted by me
Because that's sort of why I declared her innocent and said what I did about her. I thought for sure she was not a WW, and not the Seer, but an Ordo that was likely to be a lynching distraction to other Ordos, and therefore thought it best that she die during the Night. So I did what I could to make her look like an attractive target.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shasta
That does it. Since, as far as I know, this game isn't innocent vs. innocent, there's no way you can be innocent. I don't believe this.
|
Oh, you don't say? You should really go ask
Dancing Spawn about the time I tried to set her up to die. I was an Ordo in that game too.
Lommy and
Nogrod might remember that. It was in their WerePenguin game.
I believe I also lied that I was the Hunter in that game. But no doubt lying about being the Hunter means that you can't possibly be innocent in your book.
Hate to say it, lad, but I'm way meaner and evil when I'm an Ordo than I am when I'm a WW.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by me
4) The Seer has almost certainly checked us by now.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Green
Why do you think so? Or rather, it's somewhat obvious what the reasoning behind that is, the question is what makes you reason that way? (Oh, and it wasn't me who complained about complicated sentences, was it? ) My, that question really is horrible. If you don't get what it means (I'm almost ready to call you genius if you get it), then just answer the original question. Sorry to be so unclear.
|
Erm... huh?
Okay, let's see if I can make any sense of that and answer what I think your question might be.... I would say that for sure half of my statement was true as of yesterday, and I think that it's probable that the entire statement is true as of today, but I don't know for certain at this time.
Cool?
I'm running late for work now. Be back in a few hours.