View Single Post
Old 11-18-2008, 11:42 AM   #1065
Boromir88
Laconic Loreman
 
Boromir88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 7,521
Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.
Send a message via AIM to Boromir88 Send a message via MSN to Boromir88
Quote:
Fine Boro be that as it may, what I am telling you is that you cannot expect others to believe you innocent just because you are setting these traps.~morm
It's not so much that I really expect it, because I've said to question me, that is something I do expect. But when I give an answer, leave it at that, if you agree so be it, if you don't same. There's no reason to start saying I'm being arrogant and brilliant, thus everyone else are simple and vulgar.

I know, you know, that I know I'm horribly wrong sometimes. That really doesn't bother me though, because I have no problem being the first to admit it was a bad move and I had it blown up in my face. Wasn't there one time when I doubted 100% doubted your hunter reveal, and you said I'd be eating a toaster or something like that? You were right, and I did eat a toaster just so you know.

But it's not an attempt to alienate anyone, it's my way of trying to spot wolves. If I'm right, great, if I'm wrong, then I'm wrong.

Quote:
So if I understand you correctly you are thinking Rune is a wolf now because he seemed to back me up in my suspicions against you?
Basically, although first let me say morm, I still don't trust you, so if this is an attempt to get my attention on Rune, I doubt it will work.

Anyway, the reason I was irrational and crazy in my suspicions of you yesterday was pretty much to get some reactions. I don't suspect you for the way you argued back, because truth is an innocent or a wolf would either react the same to baseless accusations or simply ignore it. My reasons against you were already made, but I didn't come out and present my reasons in a rational form because if I did, it would have been far to easy for a wolf to turn and support my reasons. However, if I came out abrasive, crazy, and like I was randomly lashing out, then I thought a wolf would either be quick to jump on and agree with me, or to defend you.

The way you reacted could be anybody, it doesn't tell me anything, but I think the way others react do. Rune was quick to jump to your defense and call for you to lynch me. And someone may ask well why would a wolf be that obvious in coming to one of their packmates defense? My reasoning against you yesterday was completely irrational, therefor maybe you both (or a wolf) assumed it would be easy to defend against my baseless accusations. That will come probably at around 4 or 5 when I can get back. That isn't all either, I have some other places of Rune, calling you a visionary and such.

But, like I said, the attempt to turn my attention to Rune isn't going to work. I still think you're a wolf, and my reasons against Rune are almost entirely based on my suspicions of you. So, unless you can convince me you're innocent and Rune is a wolf trying to attach onto your innocent reasons, well I'm probably going to vote for you, because my reasons are primarily based on your role.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
Boromir88 is offline   Reply With Quote