Quote:
Originally Posted by Legate of Amon Lanc
That's for the second time. Stop that! It scares me always when I see it in the text...
|
And yet, I've seen nothing you've offered thus far to refute it, save the same conjecture I am using; therefore, I have no inclination to 'stop it' (particularly since it irritates you so
). For instance....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legate of Amon Lanc
Indeed, but these rules don't apply always in M-E, and I actually find it pretty Middle-Earthish to drive Sauron away and not to tear down the walls. It's a typical M-E mistake, something like that the Ring should have been destroyed after Sauron was killed, and so on. People in M-E very often make the mistake of getting rid of the "surface" problem, while not destroying the "roots". Thus, I find leaving Dol Guldur's fortress alone as a veeery classic mistake which later showed to be rather a problem.
|
Hmmm...but why then did Galadriel deem it so important to throw down the towers of Dol Guldur
after Sauron's demise? Likewise, Elessar had Minas Morgul utterly destroyed
after Sauron and the WiKi were long gone. Why the necessity
after the fact? The importance of such a demolition was just as crucial prior to Sauron's defeat, if not more so, don't you think?
Further back in M-e history, Utumno and Angband were both purposely destroyed in separate wars (not as systematically as one would like, of course, because Angband had to be reduced twice). But one would think a scholarly loremaster such as Elrond or a long-lived Noldo like Galadriel would insist on such destruction as a matter of course, based on previous experiences of their race, unless their primary concern was to drive Sauron off, as it would seem unlikely and naive if they believed he could actually be utterly destroyed, even with Saruman's shiny new devices. Therefore, it is evident to me the White Council did not have a legion of Elves storming the ramparts (the same mythical army that, of course, saved Helm's Deep).
