Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sally
I honestly don't mind people suspecting me -really, I don't, it's part of the game- but I don't like that I'm usually suspected for no reason.
|
Trust me I know the feeling.
Kath, I don't know why but I think
sally reminds me more of a bear than a wolf... And I know I should go find some evidence but it's difficult because this is so irrational. Well let's see what I can do while I'm here.
Bowie it was just a theory. If you're ready to vote yourself because of it, you're overreacting.
Also, since your comment about players saying they're active ie innocent was quite clearly directed to me, I ask you to point out where I've used my activity as an argument for my innocence. I have used it as an argument for not bothering to post but that's all. Certainly not everybody but too many are so quiet it feels a bit frustrating to sit online the whole day.
In my experience here on the Downs posting much nonsense doesn't help give an active impression. It requires some actual substance.
Also, for one posting only serious analysis you have surprisingly many two-liners,
Bowie. I don't like being accused of posting not entirely necessary posts by someone who isn't that much better off himself.
In
sally's defence I must say she always posts the vote counts. They can be useful if someone bothers to take a look, or then not.
I agree with
Gwath about
Bowie's threat. We have two options: either to take your word on it and trust in your innocence, or actually lynch you to check. If you don't have that much suspicion against you it's not very likely we bothered to lynch you yet. So no I'm not taking your threat seriously. You could be bluffing very very easily.