[Aganzir]

On day 1 Gwath said to phantom that he shouldn't assume he had been dreamed of. Back then I thought it could be a seer hint but didn't pursue the idea further as there seemed to be no reason later. He also warned phantom about assuming that ordos try to get killed instead of gifteds.

He said to Fea that ignoring her was the best thing we could do until she stopped confusing us and started actually playing. Nog accused him based on this, saying he was too eager to show he was a decent player himself. I still don't quite agree with Nog, and I think Gwath's response was reasonable ("Nogrod attempts to make himself look good by accusing me of trying to make myself look good.").

Gwath was suspicious of Nog for his case against him but said he wouldn't vote him yet (which he did, after all), and Lari who, in his opinion, didn't say anything. He said he would need more time to decide if it was just natural lack of confidence or something more sinister. 'Something more sinister' is a phrase that always tips me off. There's just something so wolfish in it.
He had noticed Nog's divo comment but assumed it was a joke. Someone brought up a point that innocents should have been careful about lynching Nog after that, but I can hardly blame him, voting for Nog myself too.

On day 2 Gwath defended himself against Mac, who had called his vote careless, by saying their votes weren't very different in terms of context and consequences, and that Mac had actually less reasons to vote for Menel than Gwath had for Nog. I agree with this, but on the other hand I'm still rather suspicious of Mac. I don't think they're both wolves.

Gwath responded reasonably to Boro's statement that he & Nog's argument had been over semantics ie meaningless crap.
He was a bit suspicious of sally and didn't like the Gollum votes. He voted for sally but crossed with deadline.

Okay on to day 3... Gwath voiced the obvious ie we should seriously consider lynching the people the seer suspected the most. He pointed out tgwbs had said most guilty instead of most suspicious, but as Boro already said different people have different ways to phrase things. If I label people either as Guilty, Innocent or Neither, I don't seriously mean that half the people don't have a role.
If he was Fea's fellow critic, I'm not sure he would have brought up more points against her. However we probably shouldn't pay much attention to who were all for lynching Fea and who were wavering since I'm rather sure the wolves just decided to sacrifice her.

Gwath thought I deserved as much attention as Fea but that we shouldn't double lynch us, seeing what happened last time. However here the situation was somewhat different. On day 1 the double lynch was an accident and there was no spectacular evidence against either lynchee, whereas here we were the main suspects of the seer. Therefore an innocent would probably have thought that the risk of a catastrophical double lynch was considerably smaller than on day 1.

Did the wolves have any inkling as to who the cobbler is? If they did, they were probably for a double lynching of Fea and me yesterday. But if they didn't and eg thought I was the cobbler (since I was listed as equally guilty as Fea), I think they would have been against it.

Gwath agreed with Gollum once he had asked why not double lynch us. I don't like it very much because now, had we been double lynched, he could have accused Gollum of making him believe it was a good idea.
He also said he hadn't said we should kill us both, just that we should seriously consider doing so as there was still a chance tgwbs hadn't dreamed of either. While it is possible he tried to defend his fellow (which would have been quite useless at that point though), it makes me feel better about him. A wolf would probably have gone after us both so as to minimize their losses.
He ended up voting for me.

When Fea retracted and voted herself, Gwath thought it looked suspicious and said it really looked like Fea didn't want a double lynch. I don't think his reaction is very suspicious.

Today Gwath thought Mac's support of double lynch seemed odd given the consequences of the previous double lynch. Rather hypocritical. Yesterday Gwath himself was ready to lynch us both. I don't like the way he turns against Mac now.

**

As for interaction between Gwath and Fea, on day 1 she quoted him and told who her favourite movie villain is. She also said Gwath should be lynched instead of her for forgetting that the point of the game is to amuse Mith, which Fea was doing. But this was Fea's list with meta-reasons.

When Nog accused Gwath of overreacting to suspicions, Fea vaguely defended him, saying innocents tend to get more irritated of being unjustly suspected. She added, though, that in her opinion wolves become hostile over little suspicions whereas ordos react to major ones. So in the end she seemed to reach no conclusion about Gwath and both defended and accused him within a few sentences. Gwath was also on her list of possible voting candidates.

On day 2 Fea put Gwath in her Concerned category along with Boro and Ilya, both of whom probably innocent, and said she intended to vote for him. I wonder if she had treated a fellow like that on day 2 as he wasn't *that* suspected. In the end she voted Ilya though, saying she didn't have time to substantiate any arguments against Gwath.

**

I would be rather willing to assume that either Mac or Gwath is a critic. Of those Mac looks more suspicious to me right now, but if one dies and turns out to be innocent, the other deserves to be looked at closely. I don't think they both are wolves, though. The interaction between them and Fea together doesn't look that wolfish.

edit: xed with Cailín & two Gwaths