Okay. I have just finished reading Day 2. Two basic things I conclude are written at the end of the post.
Now onto what I have read there in particular:
LG. Post 247: Is it so that there is nobody you actually suspect? Except for Sally, most people are either not alarming, or she has no idea about them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rune Son of Bjarne
oh just a quick note about Frodo: Obviously people can play how they wish, but I always got the impression that Frodo was on our side. This should mean that he does not speculate in shifting sides and such, so Frodo should always act in a way that benifits his current team.
Just like Frodo did not consider letting the wraith stap him in weathertop so that he could becoe a wraith and join Sauron, however it was a risk. . .but not a choice.
|
Rune: Agreed and I could not say it better. (Even though I said that already before, and not just me, but some others as well.) That does not mean revealing rightaway, but some kind of trying to pass unnoticed by the Wraiths.
Rune seems innocent to me (and his post #254 seems good to me).
Aganzir seems more like innocent to me, and it may as well be that she really is, and not just pretends this time - like she often does. Where of course, one can never be certain... but I think she may be really innocent.
Mac makes some sense throughout the Day, but I believe if anyone, he is up to impersonating a sensible innocent while being a Wolf and wishing all the worst.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macalaure
I see these options:
1. The wraiths were under unexpectedly much Day1-pressure and chose a safe kill. this is unlikely, though, since there are better ways to divert attention.
2. The wraiths were under absolutely no pressure and the village was entirely wrong about each candidate. The trail-less kill was chosen to prolong this state.
3. The wraiths are timid by nature and didn't dare to assault anybody who even might leave a track towards them. (In this case, they might even have thought that Shasta was the seer.)
4. The wraiths are sportsmen who thought it was a good idea to keep those alive that talked more and kill those who talked less.
-While Option 1 is possible, I'd like to discard it for now - mostly because that goes along with my suspicions from yesterday (it would more or less mean that both Lommy and Brinn are wraiths).
-Option 2 only means that Lommy and Brinn (and me, of course) are innocent. The wraiths could be anybody else.
-Option 3 leads us, I think, to Lari, Mirandir, and Beregond, for (relative) newbieness, and to Lommy, Brinn, and maybe Lily, for being of a more timid nature. It exonerates villagers who are both daring and dominant, such as Legate, Rikae, Nogrod, and Nerwen.
-Option 4 points to Legate and Nogrod (not saying that everybody else is not sportsmanlike, but those two are most likely to make a point of it).
|
Also, it is possible him offering these four options for why
Shasta was killed was a way of him presenting some options to the innocents: "And now, choose, come all, come all! Do you want to believe X is a Wolf? Option #1 is just what you need! Or would you rather suspect Y? Come on, I am offering you this brand-new option #2! Go and lynch them!" etc.
The way
Beregond reacted to this joke of
Rikae's (her saying that she is the seer) - I don't like it. A newbie could ask if it was a joke, yes, why not, but the way he ends up thinking about it seriously... still, he is a newbie.
But what more,
Fea was feeding it. She is obviously desperately trying to make the Wolves know she is on their side. Because otherwise, I cannot imagine HER - an experienced player - getting confused by somebody like
Beregond (read: a newbie

No offense,
Beregond) and actually questioning this obvious joke! And I do not even stop to think that
Fea could even consider this a serious revelation. Come on.
And
Menel actually said a good thing about this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meneltarmacil
I'd suggest we keep any speculation regarding the Innkeeper/Seer to ourselves. Discussing Seerish comments openly just draws the wraiths towrd the true Seer, which isn't good. True, it may help to protect said person, but I personally think it wise to conceal the Seer's identity from xyr enemies as long as possible.
|
Which makes me think - was this an attempt from
Fea to draw out the real Seer? Quite possible. Very possible.
And related, one more thing to
Beregond:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beregond
But like you say it could be a red herring, or just in fun. Still, if that is true it's a strange statement as it doesn't help innocents much, does it?
|
I don't get this, is "red herring" any saying, or does it have anything to do with me? (You know, my role.) Like, if
Berewolf could give hints to
Fea Ferny, trying to communicate, like that I was the Seer, or something?
Mac's list in #326 is so "neutral" (in the sense: most people are "innocent" or "no idea about" or such), so that I can imagine it as a list of a Wolf trying to be on good terms with everyone, especially as it seems that he may be suspected by some.
(Which is, as I see, exactly what
Rikae said in her post right after that.)
I have to ask, at this moment, why the heck was
Mac not lynched yesterDay? At this point (where I am reading now), it looks so obvious! <= Okay, now I wrote this when I was still reading the thread, this is written when I am actually posting the post: I would not call that "so obvious" anymore, but still, he looks Wolfy enough.
And, okay, I haven't read toDay yet, but I can think of one reason (as I am reading through yesterDay) why
Nog was killed: because the Wolves thought he is a Ranger. And why? Because they thought he is a Ranger and is annoyed by the fact that (according to him)
Durelin was impersonating him. A normal person would not have taken
Dury's "ranger impersonation" (in my opinion, and probably also in the Wolves' opinion, as I really don't get what
Nog followed by that - that was really an obvious IC post) in any serious manner, but a Ranger could perhaps be more attentive and startled by that? However, it showed that
Nog was not a Ranger after all. But I can imagine the scenario working like that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor of the Peredhil
Because it can be useful to have a good idea who is playing the Ranger role.
Which seems to be what Durelin's getting at.
What I can't figure out about this game is what's with the mysterious 'obvious' reveals so early on? Rikae playing seer, Durelin posting only in Ranger garb (and third person)... What is this about? Is it just a reignited desire for simple playfulness?
Or is there something secret going on with roles? Or like...
I just can't figure out why ordos would set themselves up to be lynched unless they're taking one for the team in effort to set up a bandwagon so the people later on can analyze what happened?
Like... it just doesn't make sense to me.
I'm very tempted to vote Dury as I don't know what she's playing at. I feel like the Ranger wouldn't make a point of making herself wraith-bait.
|
Geez! And again! Okay, I don't mind when
Mirandir asks about debating about the Ranger, he is a newbie. But
Fea AGAIN joins in a speculation which started (by a newbie's remark) about a Gifted's role! Gifteds are not to be speculated about! They are too valuable for the village to reveal, for Eru's sake, not unless there is any good reason for them to do that!
Fea is not a newbie, she should know that. SHE IS A COBBLER! There can be NO OTHER explanation.
****
My two most important conclusions of Day 2:
1.
Fea is an OBVIOUS Cobbler. Informer. Bill Ferny. Whatever you call it.
2.
Mac is likely a Wolf. Wraith. Whatever you call it.
These two information, unless they get relativised by what I read today, are two basic things I would like to propose in front of you to consider. I really can't see how anybody can think otherwise (about
Fea at least), and how people might have voted
Durelin, for mostly quite silly reasons (need to look at that once again, but in general, saving
Fea makes little sense - even though of course it is better to lynch a Wraith than an Informer, though - but when she was about to go already... people were actually
saving her, that's what was the worst on that).
Now onto toDay and I will be with you in the present.