[Brinniel]

Since it looks like I'm a goner anyway, I might as well share some thoughts so my death won't be completely pointless. I'm feeling rather bitter about the village's foolishness, but I want to put that aside. Anyway, I really hope the mods won't make seer again anytime soon as I'm finding this completely stressful:

Originally Posted by Nerwen

Lommy, I thought you might be the Seer. I'm so glad to have been right about something, after yesterDay.

Sounds like something a wolf would say in order to get on Lommy's good side.

Originally Posted by Greenie

First, Fea. The easy way would be to simply accuse people like Rikae and Legate who were heavily for her lynching. However, I'm not sure whether a wraith would like to be so noisily for lynching someone they know is innocent anyway since that might cast some suspicion on them the next Day. What I think we really need to look at is the people who slip by the flow, voicing a sufficient amount of suspicion for Fea and voting according to the general consensus. I'll see to that if I have time.

This sounds like a smart comment. I would most certainly look at those who went with the flow to keep unnoticed. It's more likely Legate and Rikae are innocent and kept alive to become potential targets.

Originally Posted by Aganzir

Brinn's way of revealing looks more honest compared to Lommy (when a baddie tries to impersonate a gifted, there's often a certain by-the-way attitude, which I think Lommy had in her post. Garr I can't explain it better, it's just that it takes you a while to realise there's a gifted revealing. Okay that was a bad way of saying it, it's hard to explain), but I trust Lommy more. She being the seer makes much more sense.

I still find this statement poorly said. Do you care to attempt to further explain, Agan?

Originally Posted by Beregond

Actually I just meant the part about "taking a closer look at everyone" having to wait till "tomorrow" after "sleep".

The "taking a closer look" part was somewhat of a hint, though the sleep part simply had to do with RL.

Originally Posted by Legate

I thought about that too, at first. But then, after re-reading Sally's post, I ruled that out. It would have been helpful for the Wolves to lure the village into confusion on whether one of the Wolves who remain is a Wolf from the beginning or Frodo, but Sally gave it out, and I believe it was an innocent slip. Most of all, because I believe she was not able to communicate with the Wolves yet: I presume at Night, everybody sent their picks, and the Mod needed to get the PM from Wolves, then wait also for the PM from the Ranger (if perchance he did not save the target), and only then send PM to Frodo that he was turned. It would make sense that Sally could not PM with the Wolves at all, therefore she saw her newly formed Wraith-star rise and fall. Most lucky, otherwise it might have helped the general confusion.

I'm sure the wraiths would want Sally to look like she was the RB so that everyone else would stop looking for Frodo.

Originally Posted by Menel

One thing I'm wondering about: If Brinn is a wraith, which I definitely consider possible, why does she also mention Sally as a wraith? And why would a Lommywraith point the finger at her fellow wraith Sally if she wants to sow confusion?

This is an extremely safe comment and inaccurate and possibly wolfish.

Mirandir's defense looks fairly innocent.

Originally Posted by Aganzir

Rikae's suggestion to lynch Brinn is a good one. I thought about it too but she managed to post first. I don't think it makes much difference which one of them gets to chat one night more, but it would be rather uncomfortable if the ranger protected Brinn while the wraiths attacked Lommy.
*scrolls down further and notices Lomz has already said the same*

Seems like an easy way to bandwagon.

Originally Posted by Rikae

Both? There are four, and you only "dreamed of" one.

It wasn't a slip...there are two wraiths and one RingBearer. Seriously, you're picking apart my words just so you can find a better excuse after your suspiciously bandwagoning vote.