On day 1
Greenie wondered if Frodo's role is revealed if xe gets lynched. She said it would sound ideal if no one discovered Frodo's identity, and we should concentrate on finding the wraiths, not the RB. She voted for Gollum as she felt the worst about him.
On day 2 she accused
Nog of making the day 1 votes such an issue. I can agree with her,
Nog was strange. In #247 she thought
Brinn looked innocent and had no read on
sally. The whole list was quite close to my own opinions.
Brinn found her suspiciously careful & was worried about her. I don't think she would've treated a fellow who wasn't suspected almost at all like that.
She voted for
Nog, which is alright with me.
Greenie started to get a bad feeling about
Lari on day 3. Me too. She still found
Brinn okay & had no read on
sally. Voted
Fea. Understandable.
Then day 4, after Frodo was turned.
Greenie said that the easiest thing to do about the
Fea bandwagon would be to look at the people who were for it the most, ie
Rikae and
Legate, but she expressed doubts about a wolf being so loudly for an innocent's lynching. She added that we should look for people who go with the flow.
As for Frodo, she said it's important we compare people's posts to their posts on the previous days.
I'm still uncomfortable with the way
Greenie says she believes
Lommy's claim. She repeats things - says twice she's inclined to believe
Lommy's claim for now, with almost exactly the same phrasing. Also, she suggests a thing but takes it back instantly, in a way:
Lommy would be a very bold wolf as she'd lose two of her fellows, but then again Frodo is a wolf now... Today would be the perfect time to impersonate the seer, but then again it wouldn't make sense... She could be Ferny, but then again it doesn't seem very likely... And in the end
Greenie half aplogizes, half explains why she was so eager to cast some random suspicion which she took back so that all that was left was a vague bad feeling that
Lommy might not be the seer, after all:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greenie
I'm inclined to believe Lommy's claim for now. I just want to turn every stone and check through every possibility, just in case.
|
Day 5. She said
Legate seemed very innocent. If they're fellows, that's a bold thing to do. Also, she found it more likely that
Mac was innocent than Ferny.
Then there's her
Menel analysis. She brings up valid points against him, but at the same time it seems somehow too easy.
Menel almost always comes across as suspicious, and
Greenie seems to be making too much into things. Exaggerating.
Today the people she did not find specifically innocentish were
Lari (flip-flopping on her),
Mira (no read),
Nerwen (no read), and
Menel (somewhat suspicious, might vote in lack of better suspects).
She wondered why
Mac hadn't died and reached the conclusion it's possible he's Ferny. If she's a wolf &
Mac is Ferny, she could probably have found a way to hint the wolves thought
Mac was protected or wanted to leave
him alive for confusion's sake. However, if he is not the cobbler, it's reasonable for a
Greenwolf to say so.
She said she didn't want to vote for
Menel today if he couldn't defend himself. In a way I can understand her, but at the same time I think that at this stage we should vote for our primary suspects.
In the end she voted for
Lari.
**
I think she looked quite innocent up until Frodo was turned, but right after that she made some eyebrow-raising comments. Today she has looked more innocentish again. Garr I don't know! It could also be that she's got more used to being a wolf again and that's why the change for the better in her behaviour...
++Greenie
Right now I suspect her more than
Lari and I don't want to start spreading the votes by voting for
Legate. Also, if she's a wolf, then I'm pretty positive
Legate is one, too. It would just make sense.
edit: xed with Nerwen & two Menels. Good catch about the bells ringing.