Quote:
Originally Posted by davem
And that would apply if the 'person' was Hitler, or Torquemada, or the 'identifiable group of people' included Nazis, White Supremacists, suicide bombers...? Or are certain 'identifiable groups of people' excluded?
|
Since you are so eager to learn about Canadian law, which was what I was referencing, here's a link that explains it:
when hate is a crime It's a contentious law--as
William Cloud Hicklin's post makes clear, so I'll also post this link:
Parliamentary Information and Research on Hate Propaganda
However, the existence of the law serves the function in this discussion of proving that not just fantasy but all writing is subject to legal limits to what is allowed.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by davem
I'd say it has merely been rejected...
|
You say
to-mah-to and I say
to-may-to.
Quote:
|
But its fantasy, so any relation to reality at all is not a requirement
|
This statement ignores the quotations from Tolkien's OFS that set up two requirements for fantasy, credibility and arresting strangeness, which is the core of the discussion.