Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
I don't think it would be a flippant test but something based on quite a believable scenario - as I explained earlier. Believable scenarios have been wrong in the past - but they have been right as well. And if I have to choose between random and argued lynch I'd sure choose the latter. The question is just whether we can argue for a better case as there are two ducks still remaining?
So if you Dury are a goodie I'd suggest you rolled up your sleeves and took into it.
But if Nilp and Mith are going to vote on just whatever whim that pleases them, we might as well quit the game right now. Why bother trying to find out the last ducks if only two of us will try to catch the duck and two will vote against any duck-vote... and two will vote whatever they please? Meaning the outcome of the vote - and the game - will depend on any whim the "neutrals" happen to have...  |
Don't be so sanctimonious. It isn't my fault. I have done everything I could for the village til now to no avail. You have no idea.
So I have gone back to my role and decided "It is no longer about good and evil; it is about who's nice to me".