Quote:
Originally Posted by Isabellkya
But Nog, I don't think you can have it both ways. Either Eomer was killed because he was one whom fit the bill of being a sensible voter, or he wasn't - courtesy of your vote for him. Which I think had something to do with how he had voted. Savvy?
|
Bingo!
Well he can be a very sensible voter and would surely have been one as the game went on. I think everyone who has played with him knows that.
His two votes looked fishy to me (especially as he voted for the same person) and that's why I suspected him. Now as I know he was not a mutineer, things look different (and to be honest my reasons for suspecting
Mira yesterDay before hearing that she would have to quit were basically the same
Eomer told us toDay - and I hold them to be quite sensible suspicions - although they turned out to be wrong).
On a second subject altogether. As you all know the main target of the baddies is the seer / spy: the sooner they got her/him the better for them. Now
Eomer really wouldn't be the first choice if hunting for a seer: he's act was too weird - as it almost got him lynched. So can we then deduce from that that they believe they have the spy bagged already?
If so - then whether
Greenie tells the truth of being the spy or is a co-opsie trying to fool us - it would make
Nerwen look more trustworthy. For surely she must be "non-mutineer" if the mutineers think
Greenie could be the spy? Otherwise they'd see the discrepancy (for
Nerwen would be a mutineer herself for them to be able to see
Greenie lied). But in that case they would be going for the spy with all they have! And it looks like they aren't...
Well, it's not anything conclusive like nothing will be in this game. But we need to gather circumstantial evidence - or plausible hypotheses - and when we one Day have a load of them concerning one person we might start trusting that one a bit more.